Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
258 lines (188 loc) · 14 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

258 lines (188 loc) · 14 KB
Raw

gke-metadata-server

release release

A GKE Metadata Server emulator for making it easier to use GCP Workload Identity Federation inside non-GKE Kubernetes clusters, e.g. KinD, on-prem, managed Kubernetes from other clouds, etc. This implementation tries to mimic the gke-metadata-server DaemonSet deployed automatically by Google in the kube-system namespace of GKE clusters that have the feature Workload Identity enabled. See how it works.

Usage

Steps:

  1. Install cert-manager in the cluster. This dependency is used for bootstrapping self-signed CA and TLS certificates for a MutatingWebhook that adds the required networking configuration to the user Pods.
  2. Configure GCP Workload Identity Federation for Kubernetes.
  3. Deploy gke-metadata-server in the cluster using the Workload Identity Provider full name, obtained after step 2.
  4. See ./k8s/test-pod.yaml for an example of how to configure your Pods and their ServiceAccounts.
  5. (Optional but highly recommended) Verify gke-metadata-server's artifact signatures to make sure you are deploying authentic artifacts distributed by this project.

If you don't want to depend on cert-manager and want to deploy the MutatingWebhook in a different way, the Helm chart offered here is not for you (but please feel free to copy and modify).

Configure GCP Workload Identity Federation for Kubernetes

Steps:

  1. Create a Workload Identity Pool and Provider pair for the cluster.
  2. Grant Kubernetes ServiceAccounts permission to impersonate Google Service Accounts.

Official docs and examples are here.

More examples for all the configuration described in this section are available here: ./terraform/test.tf. This is where we provision the infrastructure required for testing this project in CI and development.

Create a Workload Identity Pool and Provider pair for the cluster

Before granting ServiceAccounts of a Kubernetes cluster permission to impersonate Google Service Accounts, a Workload Identity Pool and Provider pair must be created for the cluster in Google Cloud Platform.

A Pool is a namespace for Subjects and Providers, where Subjects represent the identities to whom permission to impersonate Google Service Accounts are granted, i.e. the Kubernetes ServiceAccounts in this case.

A Provider stores the OpenID Connect configuration parameters retrieved from the cluster for allowing Google to verify ServiceAccount Tokens issued by the cluster. Specifically for the creation of a Provider, see an example in the ./Makefile, target create-or-update-provider.

The ServiceAccount Tokens issued by Kubernetes are JWT tokens. Each such token is exchanged for an OAuth 2.0 Access Token that impersonates a Google Service Account. During a token exchange, the Subject is mapped from the sub claim of the JWT (achieved in the Makefile example by --attribute-mapping=google.subject=assertion.sub). In this case the Subject has the following format:

system:serviceaccount:{k8s_namespace}:{k8s_sa_name}

The Subject total length cannot exceed 127 characters (docs).

Attention 1: If you update the private keys of the ServiceAccount Issuer of the cluster you must update the Provider with the new OpenID Connect configuration, otherwise service will be disrupted.

Attention 2: Please make sure not to specify any audiences when creating the Provider. The emulator uses the default audience when issuing the ServiceAccount Tokens. The default audience contains the full name of the Provider, which is a strong restriction:

//iam.googleapis.com/{provider_full_name}

where {provider_full_name} has the form:

{pool_full_name}/providers/{provider_short_name}

and {pool_full_name} has the form:

projects/{gcp_project_number}/locations/global/workloadIdentityPools/{pool_short_name}

Grant Kubernetes ServiceAccounts permission to impersonate Google Service Accounts

For allowing the Kubernetes ServiceAccount {k8s_sa_name} from the namespace {k8s_namespace} to impersonate the Google Service Account {gcp_service_account}@{gcp_project_id}.iam.gserviceaccount.com, grant the IAM Role roles/iam.workloadIdentityUser on this Service Account to the following principal:

principal://iam.googleapis.com/{pool_full_name}/subject/system:serviceaccount:{k8s_namespace}:{k8s_sa_name}

This principal will be reflected as a Subject in the Google Cloud Console webpage of the Pool.

If you plan to use the GET /computeMetadata/v1/instance/service-accounts/default/identity API for issuing Google OpenID Connect Tokens to use in external systems, you must also grant the IAM Role roles/iam.serviceAccountOpenIdTokenCreator on the Google Service Account to the Google Service Account itself, i.e. the following principal:

serviceAccount:{gcp_service_account}@{gcp_project_id}.iam.gserviceaccount.com

This "self-impersonation" permission is necessary because the gke-metadata-server emulator retrieves the Google OpenID Connect Token in a 2-step process: first it retrieves the Google Service Account OAuth 2.0 Access Token using the Kubernetes ServiceAccount Token, and then it retrieves the Google OpenID Connect Token using the Google Service Account OAuth 2.0 Access Token.

Deploy gke-metadata-server in your cluster

A Helm Chart is available in the following Helm OCI Repository:

ghcr.io/matheuscscp/gke-metadata-server-helm:{helm_version} (GitHub Container Registry)

Here {helm_version} is a Helm Chart SemVer, i.e. the field .version at ./helm/gke-metadata-server/Chart.yaml. Check available releases in the GitHub Releases Page.

See the Helm Values API at ./helm/gke-metadata-server/values.yaml. Make sure to specify at least the full name of the Workload Identity Provider.

Alternatively, you can write your own Kubernetes manifests and consume only the container image:

ghcr.io/matheuscscp/gke-metadata-server:{container_version} (GitHub Container Registry)

Here {container_version} is the app version, i.e. the field .appVersion at ./helm/gke-metadata-server/Chart.yaml. Check available releases in the GitHub Releases Page.

Verify the image signatures

For verifying the images above use the cosign CLI tool.

For verifying the image of a given Container GitHub Release (tags v{container_version}), fetch the digest file container-digest.txt attached to the Github Release and use it with cosign:

cosign verify ghcr.io/matheuscscp/gke-metadata-server@$(cat container-digest.txt) \
    --certificate-oidc-issuer=https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com \
    --certificate-identity=https://github.com/matheuscscp/gke-metadata-server/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/heads/main

For verifying the image of a given Helm Chart GitHub Release (tags helm-v{helm_version}), fetch the digest file helm-digest.txt attached to the Github Release and use it with cosign:

cosign verify ghcr.io/matheuscscp/gke-metadata-server-helm@$(cat helm-digest.txt) \
    --certificate-oidc-issuer=https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com \
    --certificate-identity=https://github.com/matheuscscp/gke-metadata-server/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/heads/main

Automatic verification

If you are using Kyverno for enforcing policies you can automate the container verification using Keyless Verification.

If you are using FluxCD for deploying Helm Charts you can automate the chart verification using Keyless Verification.

Security Risks and Limitations

Pod identification by IP address

The server uses the client IP address reported in the HTTP request to identify the requesting Pod in the Kubernetes API (just like in the native GKE implementation).

If an attacker can easily perform IP address impersonation attacks in your cluster, e.g. ARP spoofing, then they will most likely exploit this design choice to steal your credentials. Please evaluate the risk of such attacks in your cluster before choosing this tool.

(Please also note that the attack explained in the link above requires Pods configured with very high privileges, which should normally not be allowed in sensitive/production clusters. If the security of your cluster is really important, then you should be enforcing restrictions for preventing Pods from being created with such high privileges in the majority of cases.)

Pods running on the host network

In a cluster there may also be Pods running on the host network, i.e. Pods with the field spec.hostNetwork set to true. Such Pods do not fork a new network namespace, i.e. they share the network namespace of the Kubernetes Node where they are running on.

The emulator Pods themselves, for example, need to run on the host network in order to listen to TCP/IP connections coming from Pods running on the same Kubernetes Node, which are the ones this emulator Pod will serve. Just like in the GKE implementation, this design choice makes it such that the (unencrypted) communication between the emulator and a client Pod never leaves the Node.

Because Pods running on the host network use a shared IP address, i.e. the IP address of the Node itself where they are running on, they cannot be uniquely identified by the server using the client IP address reported in the HTTP request. This is a limitation of the Kubernetes API, which does not provide a way to identify Pods running on the host network by IP address.

To work around this limitation, Pods running on the host network are allowed to use a shared Kubernetes ServiceAccount associated with the Node where they are running on. This ServiceAccount can be configured in the annotations or labels of the Node, and it defaults to the ServiceAccount of the emulator (or to a ServiceAccount specified in the emulator's CLI flags if not using the official Helm Chart distributed here, check the chart manifest). The syntax is:

annotations: # or labels
  gke-metadata-server.matheuscscp.io/serviceAccountName: <k8s_sa_name>
  gke-metadata-server.matheuscscp.io/serviceAccountNamespace: <k8s_namespace>

Prefer using annotations since they are less impactful than labels to the cluster. Unfortunately, as of July 2024, most cloud providers support customizing only labels in node pool templates, and some don't even support this kind of customization at all. It's up to you how you annotate/label your Nodes.

You may also simply assign a Google Service Account to the Kubernetes ServiceAccount of the emulator and use it for all the Pods of the cluster that are running on the host network. This can be done through the Helm Chart value config.googleServiceAccount.

Be careful and try to avoid using shared identities! This is obviously dangerous!

The iptables rules

Attention: The iptables rules installed in the network namespace of mutated Pods will redirect outbound traffic targeting 169.254.169.254:80 to the emulator port on the Node. If you are using similar tools or equivalent Workload Identity features of managed Kubernetes from other clouds, this configuration may have a direct conflict with other such tools or features. It's a common practice among cloud providers using this endpoint to implement such features. Especially when mutating Pods that will run on the host network, the rules will be installed on the network namespace of the Node! Please be sure to know what you are doing when using this tool inside complex environments.

Token Cache

When the emulator is configured to cache tokens, the issued Google OAuth 2.0 Access and OpenID Connect Identity Tokens are cached and returned to client Pods on every request until their expiration.

This means that even if you revoke the required permissions for the Kubernetes ServiceAccount to issue those tokens, the client Pods will still get those tokens from the emulator until they expire. This is a limitation of how the permissions are evaluated: they are evaluated only when the tokens are issued, which is what caching tries to avoid. If your use case requires immediate revocation of permissions, then you should not use token caching.

Tokens usually expire in 1 hour.

Disclaimer

This project was not created by Google. Enterprise support from Google is not available. Use this tool at your own risk. (But please do feel free to report bugs and CVEs, request help, new features and contribute.)

Furthermore, this tool is not necessary for using GCP Workload Identity Federation inside non-GKE Kubernetes clusters. This is just a facilitator. Kubernetes and GCP Workload Identity Federation work together by themselves. This tool just makes your Pods need much less configuration to use GCP Workload Identity Federation, by making the configuration as close as possible to how Workload Identity is configured in a native GKE cluster.