Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add mdn-bcd-collector update script #19971

Merged
merged 36 commits into from
Jun 29, 2023
Merged

Add mdn-bcd-collector update script #19971

merged 36 commits into from
Jun 29, 2023

Conversation

mzgoddard
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Add update script from https://github.com/GooborgStudios/mdn-bcd-collector. Add needed utilities (logger and ua-parser) and npm dependencies.

Test results and supporting details

I ran the update script locally with https://github.com/GooborgStudios/mdn-bcd-collector and https://github.com/GooborgStudios/mdn-bcd-results/tree/3af0b0ad1e7fd53098f266c80387e359288e21ad.

Running once completes without throwing an error.
Running a second time throws an error.

Error
~/browser-compat-data/node_modules/compare-versions/lib/esm/index.js:120
        throw new Error(`Invalid argument not valid semver ('${version}' received)`);
              ^
Error: Invalid argument not valid semver ('13.1> 14.1' received)
    at validateAndParse (~/browser-compat-data/node_modules/compare-versions/lib/esm/index.js:120:15)
    at compareVersions (~/browser-compat-data/node_modules/compare-versions/lib/esm/index.js:10:16)
    at compareVersions (~/browser-compat-data/node_modules/compare-versions/lib/esm/index.js:64:17)
    at update (file://~/browser-compat-data/scripts/update.ts:576:11)
    at main (file://~/browser-compat-data/scripts/update.ts:686:22)
    at async file://~/browser-compat-data/scripts/update.ts:746:3

I made a number of changes to the script:

  • Add constants from mdn-bcd-collector/lib/constants.ts to update script
  • Add relevant types from mdn-bcd-collector/types/types.ts to update script
  • Replace Array<string, string, string, TestResultValue> in Overrides with [string, string, string, TestResultValue]
  • Add type definition ManualOverride = [string, string, string, TestResultValue]
  • Type Array.isArray in overrides.filter as (item: unknown) => item is ManualOverride
  • Add MDN_COLLECTOR_DIR for loading overrides file
  • Changed overrides file path to path.join(MDN_COLLECTOR_DIR, 'custom/overrides.json'),

Dependencies added to package:

  • fs-extra
  • klaw
  • ua-parser-js
  • winston
  • @google-cloud/logging-winston

Related issues

#19868
#18514

@mzgoddard
Copy link
Contributor Author

After speaking with @foolip I've made this as a first step in reducing tech debt in the update script by moving it into browser-compat-data. I tried to keep the number of changes low to the script itself low.

There will be a lot of steps to do after merging this PR that we can list in #19868 or its own issue.

@github-actions github-actions bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency package or file. infra Infrastructure issues (npm, GitHub Actions, releases) of this project scripts Issues or pull requests regarding the scripts in scripts/. labels May 26, 2023
package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
package.json Outdated
@@ -61,16 +62,20 @@
"eslint-plugin-unicorn": "^47.0.0",
"fast-json-stable-stringify": "~2.1.0",
"fdir": "~6.0.1",
"fs-extra": "11.1.1",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is only used for fs.readJson(). Can you get rid of it and just use plain fs and JSON.parse() like other existing code in BCD?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As part of this I'm going to make reading the json files serial like what is done in index.ts. update at the moment reads the json in parallel. Since it is as of this time 1455 json files, some systems may run in EMFILE or ENFILE errors opening that many files at one time.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense, I guess @queengooborg and I never ran into that.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mzgoddard the fs-extra dependency is still here. Can it be removed now?

package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
utils/logger.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
scripts/update.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@github-actions github-actions bot added the merge conflicts 🚧 This PR needs to merge latest "main" branch to resolve a merge conflict or other issue. label May 29, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has merge conflicts that must be resolved before it can be merged.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the merge conflicts 🚧 This PR needs to merge latest "main" branch to resolve a merge conflict or other issue. label Jun 14, 2023
@mzgoddard
Copy link
Contributor Author

I resolved conflicts and tested this script vs the one in GooborgStudios/mdn-bcd-collector.

There were no differences between the changes both scripts made.

Here is a gist with the diffs of each: https://gist.github.com/mzgoddard/b1ff3687630db9c6cf05579fb8413674

@foolip
Copy link
Collaborator

foolip commented Jun 15, 2023

Brilliant, thank you @mzgoddard! I'll go ahead and merge this before there are more conflicts.

@foolip
Copy link
Collaborator

foolip commented Jun 15, 2023

Oh no, the Node LTS CI job is failing. @mzgoddard can you check if it's caused by these changes?

@mzgoddard
Copy link
Contributor Author

@foolip I checked out the CI job. Its an error from swc during generate-types.

@swc/core threw an error when attempting to validate swc compiler options.

I don't think its related to the change in the PR. I think its a flaky error. If you re-run the job I think it will pass. (I don't have the permission needed to re-run.)

@foolip
Copy link
Collaborator

foolip commented Jun 16, 2023

@mzgoddard I re-ran the job but it's still failing. Unless it's also failing in other recent PRs I guess it was caused by the changes here?

@github-actions github-actions bot added the merge conflicts 🚧 This PR needs to merge latest "main" branch to resolve a merge conflict or other issue. label Jun 16, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has merge conflicts that must be resolved before it can be merged.

@queengooborg
Copy link
Collaborator

To help reduce potential for merge conflicts, we may want to split this down into even smaller chunks. For example, the UA parser I think could be its own PR (and I have some change requests regarding it specifically that would help turn it into a useful utility).

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the merge conflicts 🚧 This PR needs to merge latest "main" branch to resolve a merge conflict or other issue. label Jun 20, 2023
@mzgoddard
Copy link
Contributor Author

I found the cause of the issue in CI testing. I made a mistake on one of the package-lock.json merges and it was persisting an older @swc/core dependency. I've checked out package-lock.json from main and reinstalled the new dependencies to resolve this.

@mzgoddard
Copy link
Contributor Author

To help reduce potential for merge conflicts, we may want to split this down into even smaller chunks. For example, the UA parser I think could be its own PR (and I have some change requests regarding it specifically that would help turn it into a useful utility).

I'll make a PR with just UA parser and its test file. (That may not reduce merge conflicts by much since UA parser has its own dependency, ua-parser-js and the merge conflicts are happening in package.json and package-lock.json.)

@github-actions github-actions bot added the merge conflicts 🚧 This PR needs to merge latest "main" branch to resolve a merge conflict or other issue. label Jun 28, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has merge conflicts that must be resolved before it can be merged.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the merge conflicts 🚧 This PR needs to merge latest "main" branch to resolve a merge conflict or other issue. label Jun 29, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@foolip foolip left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @mzgoddard for sorting out the CI issues and sending #20210 separately. I'll go ahead and merge this now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency package or file. infra Infrastructure issues (npm, GitHub Actions, releases) of this project scripts Issues or pull requests regarding the scripts in scripts/.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants