Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation how CALL messages are handled #55

Open
OrangeTux opened this issue Dec 3, 2019 · 6 comments
Open

Documentation how CALL messages are handled #55

OrangeTux opened this issue Dec 3, 2019 · 6 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request stale

Comments

@OrangeTux
Copy link
Contributor

Currently the docs are lacking proper documentation about how routing of CALL messages work, how to use the @on() and @after() decorator should be used and how the route map is build.

@OrangeTux OrangeTux added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 3, 2019
@eugenio-tesio
Copy link

Do you people had an example that implement all the operations initiated by the charge point for ocpp1.6?. In chapter 4 of the Specifications it says that the operations initiated by the charger point are:

  1. Authorize.
  2. Boot Notification.
  3. Data Transfer.
  4. Diagnostics Status Notification.
  5. Firmware Status Notification.
  6. Heartbeat.
  7. Meter Values.
  8. Start Transaction.
  9. Status Notification.
  10. Stop Transaction.

@OrangeTux
Copy link
Contributor Author

No, we don't have open source implementation of that in this repo.

@Bej-Technologies
Copy link

So there is no way to send a start/stop command to the charger using this repo?

@OrangeTux
Copy link
Contributor Author

No, that's not a correct statement. It's perfectly feasible to send a RemoteStartTransaction or RemoteStopTransaction from the CSMS to a charger. See for example this comment.

@Bej-Technologies
Copy link

Perfect! I think I just misunderstood your last comment. Now we have it up and running here, thank you for clarifying

Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Dec 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request stale
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants