Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Don't require field-only classes to be mockable. #75

Open
droeh opened this issue Oct 30, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Don't require field-only classes to be mockable. #75

droeh opened this issue Oct 30, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@droeh
Copy link

droeh commented Oct 30, 2019

Currently we require classes to not be final and to have a public or protected constructor so that they can be mocked; for field-only classes this is an unnecessary requirement, as there's no situation where mocking should be necessary.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@droeh