Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tutorials have to be redone when revisited #742

Open
ArturJD96 opened this issue Feb 5, 2025 · 6 comments
Open

Tutorials have to be redone when revisited #742

ArturJD96 opened this issue Feb 5, 2025 · 6 comments

Comments

@ArturJD96
Copy link

ArturJD96 commented Feb 5, 2025

One cannot skip the step in the tutorial.

That would normally not be an issue, but if somebody wants to go to specific step in the tutorial, they have to start all over again.

@musicEnfanthen musicEnfanthen changed the title Turtorials have to be redone when revisited Tutorials have to be redone when revisited Feb 5, 2025
@musicEnfanthen musicEnfanthen transferred this issue from music-encoding/music-encoding Feb 5, 2025
@musicEnfanthen
Copy link
Member

Thank you @ArturJD96 . That's kind of part of the pedagogical approach. ;D

If there is a strong need to skip steps, we could talk about it, but for now, we would not change it. That's OK with you?

@ArturJD96
Copy link
Author

It's not urgent indeed., I agree. There are some scenarios when it is a nuisance (e.g. browsing on phone makes it difficult to fill the test, not to mention re-filling it).

@DILewis
Copy link
Contributor

DILewis commented Feb 6, 2025

@musicEnfanthen One result of this is presumably that only the whole tutorial is citable, not individual steps. This is probably ok for small tutorials, but I can see it being a limitation.

@musicEnfanthen
Copy link
Member

musicEnfanthen commented Feb 6, 2025

@DILewis I see your point, but there is no url fragment for the single steps, so the tutorial can only be cited as a whole at the moment.

@musicEnfanthen
Copy link
Member

musicEnfanthen commented Feb 13, 2025

@ArturJD96 Are you OK with closing the issue for now, since there is not much we can do about it?

@ArturJD96
Copy link
Author

Perhaps that would defeat the purpose but what about adding an option to "show answer" that would allow for progressing the tutorial without the need to explicitly type the answer?

Again, I adress the situation of e.g. mobile browsing or consulting a single step after tutorial accomplishment – not taking shortcuts during learning.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants