-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lerna support #9
Comments
Thanks for raising @aleclarson. @mweststrate I feel the problem is related to the special characters in the name - If I use the same relative path but rename it react-spring-core, the build works (although it puts it in the wrong location in node_modules (inside if I move it builds (although the result is in the wrong place in node_modules) Is this a current known limitation of relative-deps? |
There is currently no package name sanitizing / transformation indeed, and
ends up in file paths literally at a couple of places, so yeah, probably
the `@` needs some special handling in a few cases. Should hopefully be
easy enough to add, PR welcome :)
…On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 9:29 PM Barry ***@***.***> wrote:
Thanks for raising @aleclarson <https://github.com/aleclarson>.
@mweststrate <https://github.com/mweststrate> I feel the problem is
related to the special characters in the name - If I use the same relative
path but rename it react-spring-core, the build works (although it puts it
in the wrong location in node_modules (inside
if I move
***@***.***/core": "../../githubProjects/react-spring/packages/core"
to
"react-spring-core": "../../githubProjects/react-spring/packages/core"
it builds (although the result is in the wrong place in node_modules)
Is this a current known limitation of relative-deps?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#9?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAN4NBCNENMLQCMEH4XWU4DP4ZRA3A5CNFSM4H4HIOFKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODY267OA#issuecomment-506851256>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAN4NBDIA55TGNWUCZW2J2LP4ZRA3ANCNFSM4H4HIOFA>
.
|
Thanks - will check it out 😉 |
Separately, to @aleclarson 's actual question - is there any way to relate the sub dependencies for a package used in a monorepo or is that also a potential to-do? |
My PR fixes the folder issue, but doesn't really solve the overall issue. I looked into this a bit further - relative-deps probably needs quite a bit of work for monorepo/lerna support, so I think unless someone wants to do the work to make it fully like yarn link, this can likely be closed ( I'll leave that to you @mweststrate ). I don't currently need it for my own purposes, since yarn link does a sufficient job. If someone does have slashes in their package names, then this PR will now allow that to work fine IMO. |
Removed mention of "relative-deps" since it doesn't connect monorepo dependencies (see here: mweststrate/relative-deps#9)
Removed mention of "relative-deps" since it doesn't connect monorepo dependencies (see here: mweststrate/relative-deps#9)
I am not familiar myself enough with lerna to know how it precisely deals with transitive and relative dependencies (afaik it links automatically, which doesn't solve the peer dep issue). If somebody needs it, and wants to take a shot at it. I think in principle they should be able to work together, but I currently don't have any use case or test setup to verify. |
Released as 0.1.2
…On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 1:32 AM Barry ***@***.***> wrote:
My PR fixes the folder issue, but doesn't really solve the overall issue.
I looked into this a bit further - relative-deps probably needs quite a
bit of work for monorepo/lerna support, so I think unless someone wants to
do the work to make it fully like yarn link, this can likely be closed (
I'll leave that to you @mweststrate <https://github.com/mweststrate> ). I
don't currently need it for my own purposes, since yarn link does a
sufficient job.
If someone does have slashes in their package names, then this PR will now
allow that to work fine IMO.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#9?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAN4NBDG3DW77U4CEEEAG3DP47WKFA5CNFSM4H4HIOFKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODY4B7CY#issuecomment-506994571>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAN4NBDTOKVEV2PULSIWX6DP47WKFANCNFSM4H4HIOFA>
.
|
react-spring
useslerna
in the new v9 branch. Just recently, a contributor tried usingrelative-deps
to avoid a duplicate peer dependency, but he hit some issues (see here). Thoughts on supporting such a setup, @mweststrate?I don't have time to dig deeper, but you can try it out by cloning the
v9
branch:git clone https://github.com/react-spring/react-spring -b v9 cd react-spring yarn
Ideally, you would only need to use
relative-deps
on the package you're using directly (eg:react-spring
which exists in./packages/react-spring
). Any sub-dependencies that also exist in the monorepo (eg:@react-spring/core
which exists in./packages/core
) should be installed transparently./cc @barry4dev
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: