Updated the meta.yml of subworkflows

[muneebdev7]

PR checklist

Closes #6737

• Forked the nf-core/modules repo and edited in nf-core/gitpod.
• Then performed the nf-core lint --fix for each subworkflow in the repo.
• Commits in this PR are the updated meta.yml files.

---

• This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
• If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
• If you've added a new tool - have you followed the module conventions in the contribution docs
• If necessary, include test data in your PR.
• Remove all TODO statements.
• Emit the versions.yml file.
• Follow the naming conventions.
• Follow the parameters requirements.
• Follow the input/output options guidelines.
• Add a resource label
• Use BioConda and BioContainers if possible to fulfil software requirements.
• Ensure that the test works with either Docker / Singularity. Conda CI tests can be quite flaky:
  • For modules:
    • nf-core modules test <MODULE> --profile docker
    • nf-core modules test <MODULE> --profile singularity
    • nf-core modules test <MODULE> --profile conda
  • For subworkflows:
    • nf-core subworkflows test <SUBWORKFLOW> --profile docker
    • nf-core subworkflows test <SUBWORKFLOW> --profile singularity
    • nf-core subworkflows test <SUBWORKFLOW> --profile conda

[jfy133]

I don't really understand this change, why has it deleted the old description and just moved it down?

And why is it removing meta, (which should be in all output channels except versions in this case)

@mirpedrol can you provide more context what tools is trying to do here?

[mirpedrol]

The lint command with --fix is fixing the structure of the meta, adding all input and output channels, for example in this case bin is not a channel, because it's called bins. But the description or structure can't be automatized, this must be fixed manually by copying the old descirption and/or checking the main.nf of the subworkflow and meta.yml of the included modules to know the proper content of the channels.

[jfy133]

Ahhh, completely missed that typo, my bad!

OK thank you :)

[jfy133]

This also seems broken... @mirpedrol ?

[mirpedrol]

This is but in tools, probably because of a multiline comment, thanks for pointing this out!