-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 332
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
python3.13 support + docker #1453
Comments
@thresheek Would it be possible for SysEng to bump our Python language versions without a Unit release, or would that be a bit of a pain? 🙏 |
I think we can do the following:
A couple of things that are potentially breaking someone's workflows, as we typically publish two latest language runtime versions:
|
One thing to consider in general 3.13 release. Default Python 3.13 has similar behaviour like 3.12 however there is new 3.13t version that has changes to GIL (threading mechanism). If this version would be supported by Unit it should be tested. However it's considered as an experimental feature. |
@thresheek Would it be possible to avoid the potential of breakage by instead:
@imkebe I'm super excited about the GIL removal, but we'll probably not post images to Docker Hub while it's still experimental. I do encourage you to try it locally, though, and report back! |
@callahad That is what I wanted to say - GIL is a experimental build so don't bother to include it in a Unit supported at the moment. That will come with python 3.14 |
The current implementation of the "library" definition sorts the versions and assigns non-versioned variants to whatever the latest is. We can cheat a bit and provide the manually edited file, of course, however it's not very nice from etical POV since we also publish "this file is generated via ..." line in there... |
Fair enough. I'm fine with splitting the difference: publish 3.11, 3.12, and 3.13; and allow If you're implicitly pointing at the latest version of Python, you get the latest version of Python. |
Python 3.13 had been released. There is no build for such version of the docker images
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: