Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No apero_mk_template recipes on ARI #800

Open
lauriedauplaise opened this issue Feb 3, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

No apero_mk_template recipes on ARI #800

lauriedauplaise opened this issue Feb 3, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@lauriedauplaise
Copy link
Collaborator

Starting december 31st, there are almost no recipe for mk_template, except for some rare individual targets.

The last significant number of mk_tellu were executed on december 30, using the "offline_fix_run.ini"

-->We should be getting a mk_template for each target per manual_trigger.

@njcuk9999
Copy link
Owner

So after a lot of digging its actually the way it is supposed to be (at the moment)

Currently we run a new template when we have a new object (this would be the "some rare individual targets") however we do not re-make templates of targets that already have a template (mostly because we would need to re-run all old data through the telluric+ccf+lbl process again).

So this is a fundamental problem with the online reduction when we have a new target - we observe it once and then make a template and then do not make a template again.

Note with the offline reduction this isn't a problem as we have all previous observations.

There are two short term solutions:

  1. We some how find out all objects that have templates that need updating and then run a science_run.ini that runs the telluric+ccf+lbl steps again for all observations (maybe a flag in apero checks or something?)
  2. We wait for the next offline reduction

With the current manual trigger (reducing night-by-night) its pretty hard to make it them get all nights for some targets.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants