Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 23, 2020. It is now read-only.

formal proof? #8

Open
noisesmith opened this issue Aug 21, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

formal proof? #8

noisesmith opened this issue Aug 21, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@noisesmith
Copy link
Owner

the spec claims that the program is bug free, and surely the smallness of the program is an argument in that favor

but beyond hippy bullshit like "it's a choice of something rather than nothing", how about a proof?

the work of Doctor Chuck Tingle is likely relevant here

@noisesmith
Copy link
Owner Author

am I off my gourd if I suggest "what would Andy Kauffman do" is also relevant here? am I just imagining that connection?

@noisesmith
Copy link
Owner Author

what if something was shaped like "goatse" or "duckroll" or "rickroll" but instead it was just this program? I think considering the implications of that decision might be a building block for this proof

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant