-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
certz default profiles #152
Comments
For 1: For 2: as to the Readme content.. oh, I bet I wrote that and I bet I meant: so there may be a:
Got replacement text you like? |
(Oh, that text may be Tomek's text, not mine... I'm sure I read/etc it though, ouch) |
Apologies for the confusion, I meant "not backward-compatible" change :)
That part is actually fine, I understand the .proto definition (rotate the currently used profile); in fact, I don't expect different profiles used by different gNxI services since gNMI/gNOI/gNSI are using the same port number/socket. 12 The scenario I have in mind is, for instance, if gNSI is configured with a custom profile (let's say Footnotes
|
Does the default profile have to be named "
gNxI
"?The spec implies so, but is there a reason to require a specific profile name to be used by all implementations? Usually, openconfig is not opinionated on the naming schemes. Also, this is not a new feature - there are existing implementations that support default profiles for grpc-based services, so the renaming will introduce an NBC change for all customers and deployments.
.proto and the readme have slightly different definitions of the rotate request behavior with an absent
ssl_profile_id
field: proto says to rotate the current profilegnsi/certz/certz.proto
Lines 287 to 291 in a80d61c
and the readme refers to the
GnXi
profile by namegnsi/certz/README.md
Lines 44 to 46 in a80d61c
is it required to support certz rotation for the default profile? can the cert rotation be supported only for profiles added via certZ?
e.g. in situations where the default profile uses idevID/IAK, it may not be trivial to implement the said rotation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: