You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In riscv-priv-isa, ecall from s_mode can delegate to s_mode.
But in force-riscv/riscv/src/SwitchPrivilegeSolver.cc, ecall from s_mode are handled in m_mode dircetly without checking the value of medeleg. This operation is inconsistent with riscv-priv-isa, is there any error in the implementation of force-riscv?
switch` (mResult.mInstrSeqCode) {
case 1:
if (mCurrentPrivLevel == 0) {
const RegisterFile* reg_file = mpGenerator->GetRegisterFile();
Register* medeleg_reg = reg_file->RegisterLookup("medeleg");
uint64 medeleg_val = medeleg_reg->Value();
if ((medeleg_val & 0x100) == 0x100) {
// Environment calls from U mode are delegated to S mode
mResult.mDataBlockPrivLevel = 1;
}
else {
// Environment calls from U mode are handled in M mode
mResult.mDataBlockPrivLevel = 3;
}
}
else {
mResult.mDataBlockPrivLevel = 3;
}
break;
case 2:
mResult.mDataBlockPrivLevel = mCurrentPrivLevel;
break;
case 3:
mResult.mDataBlockPrivLevel = 3;
break;
default:
LOG(fail) << "{SwitchPrivilegeSolver::ValidateAndGenerateSwitchScheme} unexpected instruction sequence code " << dec << mResult.mInstrSeqCode << endl;
FAIL("unexpected-instr-seq-code");
}
LOG(notice) << "{SwitchPrivilegeSolver::ValidateAndGenerateSwitchScheme} instruction sequence code " << dec << mResult.mInstrSeqCode << endl;
return true;
}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In riscv-priv-isa, ecall from s_mode can delegate to s_mode.
But in force-riscv/riscv/src/SwitchPrivilegeSolver.cc, ecall from s_mode are handled in m_mode dircetly without checking the value of medeleg. This operation is inconsistent with riscv-priv-isa, is there any error in the implementation of force-riscv?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: