-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test RSC SureChembl linksets #32
Comments
The URIs used in the SureChEMBL RDF should be like: http://rdf.ebi.ac.uk/resource/surechembl/molecule/SCHEMBL175877 rather than resource/chembl/molecule. So looks like there is an issue in the linkset? We have no plans to change our URIs in the foreseeable future though. On 21 Jan 2016, at 14:59, Stian Soiland-Reyes [email protected] wrote:
|
@batchelorc Any thoughts on linkset comments here? |
Thanks, @agaulton - I'll add the pattern BTW, if I do
.. I get a 500 Internal Server error :-( (I guess it should redirect to the rdf.ebi.ac.uk resource, even if it's still 404 Not Found) |
Hello chaps, Well spotted! We need to fix this, so I’ll put a JIRA item in before we generate the RDF. All the best, From: Stian Soiland-Reyes [mailto:[email protected]] @nicklynchhttps://github.com/nicklynch said RSC have created a linkset for a 100 K mini dataset for SureChMBL There is properties in this but we should not load ttl file that for now as not sure of licensing of the ACD/Labs for this I've made https://github.com/openphacts/ops-rsc-surechembl-dataset that captures this and produces the linksets only at http://repository.mygrid.org.uk/artifactory/ops/org/openphacts/data/ops-rsc-linksets/0.20151104.0-SNAPSHOT/ I've validated these with IMS, and found that they all load, except SURE_CHEMBL/LINKSET_EXACT_SURE_CHEMBL20160112.ttl, e.g. http://ops.rsc.org/OPS1931331 skos:exactMatch http://rdf.ebi.ac.uk/resource/chembl/molecule/SCHEMBL170241 . http://ops.rsc.org/OPS1931518 skos:exactMatch http://rdf.ebi.ac.uk/resource/chembl/molecule/SCHEMBL167446 . http://ops.rsc.org/OPS1931950 skos:exactMatch http://rdf.ebi.ac.uk/resource/chembl/molecule/SCHEMBL175877 . This is the most important one as it links the SCHEMBL identifiers to the OPS identifiers - thus linking SureChembl to the rest. The DataSources.txt in IMS needs to be modified to support the new URI pattern for SureChembl. Nothing is currently resolved from those URIs - @agaultonhttps://github.com/agaulton - are they going to remain as those URIs? — DISCLAIMER: This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the addressee only and may contain confidential, privileged or copyright material. It may not be relied upon or disclosed to any other person without the consent of the Royal Society of Chemistry. If you have received it in error, please contact us immediately. Any advice given by the Royal Society of Chemistry has been carefully formulated but is necessarily based on the information available, and the Royal Society of Chemistry cannot be held responsible for accuracy or completeness. In this respect, the Royal Society of Chemistry owes no duty of care and shall not be liable for any resulting damage or loss. The Royal Society of Chemistry acknowledges that a disclaimer cannot restrict liability at law for personal injury or death arising through a finding of negligence. The Royal Society of Chemistry does not warrant that its emails or attachments are Virus-free: Please rely on your own screening. The Royal Society of Chemistry is a charity, registered in England and Wales, number 207890 - Registered office: Thomas Graham House, Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 0WF |
Yep, we don’t have the SureChembl RDF in the EBI RDF platform yet, so the URIs won’t resolve at present. Are we using the SureChEMBL interface URLs somewhere in the RDF/Open PHACTS (e.g. https://www.surechembl.org/chemical/SCHEMBL175877)? I.e., is there a reason we should expect this to resolve to RDF? Cheers On 22 Jan 2016, at 10:04, Stian Soiland-Reyes [email protected] wrote:
|
From a user perspective, adding the interface URL to the IMS helps to retrieve data from the API. E.g. you could search on the SureChEMBL page and the use this URL directly in the API. |
OK that makes sense, I just wasn’t sure if it came from our side... On 22 Jan 2016, at 10:55, danidi [email protected] wrote:
|
👍 |
Agree on @danidi - also the www URI will be coming back from IMS as part of the response when looking up any of the URIs that lead to it through the RSC linkset; which could be useful for users to click on in a browser. The redirect from www to rdf is just about being good web citizen (once) you have the RDF live. I expect it fails with a 500 (rather than 406 Not Acceptable) is because you have partially got the redirection functionality there? |
@nicklynch said
I've made https://github.com/openphacts/ops-rsc-surechembl-dataset that captures this and produces the linksets only at http://repository.mygrid.org.uk/artifactory/ops/org/openphacts/data/ops-rsc-linksets/0.20151104.0-SNAPSHOT/
I've validated these with IMS, and found that they all load, except
SURE_CHEMBL/LINKSET_EXACT_SURE_CHEMBL20160112.ttl
, e.g.This is the most important one as it links the
SCHEMBL
identifiers to theOPS
identifiers - thus linking SureChembl to the rest.The
DataSources.txt
in IMS needs to be modified to support the new URI pattern for SureChembl. Nothing is currently resolved from those URIs - @agaulton - are they going to remain as those URIs?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: