You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
That's an important question, @kplawver, thast I think goes into our defining of clearer roles both for leadership and advisory team. We've never fully on-boarded the Advisory Board (granted, one of the key members was out on medical leave for 7 weeks, thus leading it to be postponed), but given the frenetic schedules of much of the people who support our work and who want to help yet lack the bandwidth to get their hands dirty, I think there's a very important role in having champions and those with experience leading agile, diverse teams inside and outside of government. Moreover, while we say we work in the open in our Core Principles, we could do a better job at improving communications and making the invisible visible by keeping the Advisory Board (and the public at large) more abreast of what we're doing regularly. The question that then hits is:
What format is best for the most people?
How often should we share updates?
Who is responsible for taking and posting notes?
Without adding yet another tool of confusion, how might we make the updates collaborative in nature, with welcome (and accessible) invitation for passersby to leave suggestions?
We touched on these questions and -– after thoughtful analysis – proposed maybe just a Facebook group might be the best option. Granted, none of us is crazy about this idea... but it does meet people where they are. Or email.
We must START to:
Contributors: Caila Brown, Rob Lingle, Nick Palumbo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: