You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If you need a review or an answer to a question, and don't have permissions to assign people, leave a comment like the following: "{{Question/comment}} @{{reviewer_username}} PTAL". Oppiabot will help assign that person for you.
Even when the message format is wrong it assigns the reviewer.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Go to any PR thread and write a message as such "PTAL smthng smthng @mention, smthng".
Expected behavior
This reviewer assignment should be appropriately done with an exact match of the format else in such a conversation it will add the reviewer mistakenly.
Additional context
It seems to be on the lookout for the term PTAL anywhere in the sentence and for any instances where the same sentence contains a @mention along with some additional word, It assigns the @mention. However, this needs to be checked once manually.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@shricodev If you leave a comment in the following format PTAL smthng smthng @mention, smthng., it will not assign a reviewer since it does not follow the following format {{Question/comment}} @{{reviewer_username}} PTAL
Describe the bug
As per the PR Pointer second bullet:
Even when the message format is wrong it assigns the reviewer.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Observed behavior
I have faced this error sometimes. oppia/oppia#18224 (comment)
Expected behavior
This reviewer assignment should be appropriately done with an exact match of the format else in such a conversation it will add the reviewer mistakenly.
Additional context
It seems to be on the lookout for the term PTAL anywhere in the sentence and for any instances where the same sentence contains a @mention along with some additional word, It assigns the @mention. However, this needs to be checked once manually.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: