Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FEATURE | Combine features from progressive branch #237

Open
AirPowerCrwChief opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

FEATURE | Combine features from progressive branch #237

AirPowerCrwChief opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@AirPowerCrwChief
Copy link

AirPowerCrwChief commented Mar 19, 2024

Wondering if it's possible to combine progressive_zl feature from progressive branch into V1.40? I just started using that branch a couple weeks ago and now that I'm using 1.40, not having that option has me jumping between versions to make a tile.

@AirPowerCrwChief AirPowerCrwChief closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 19, 2024
@AirPowerCrwChief AirPowerCrwChief changed the title FEATURE | FEATURE | Combine features from progressive branch Mar 19, 2024
@w8sl
Copy link

w8sl commented Mar 19, 2024

Yes! "Progressive mod" is done in a very smart way, with respect for the integrity of original code created by Oscar. Its 100% possible now. But shouldn't we wait a bit, until relase of XP 12.1 and see what happens and what changes are coming?

@AirPowerCrwChief
Copy link
Author

Oh we should absolutely wait. I was honestly just trying to suggest that it be added to the 12.1 release if it hasn't already been, or hadn't been thought about. I can make due bouncing around for a few more weeks. Haha!

@w8sl
Copy link

w8sl commented Mar 23, 2024

It is possible to merge progressive_zl feature into the master branch, but it may stay unofficial and experimental.
No warranty it will be possible with future versions of Ortho4XP.
Uploaded for testing as a new branch on my unofficial fork.

@w8sl
Copy link

w8sl commented May 17, 2024

Its working quite well with 12.1 with beautiful water and coastlines. I am using distance masks.
It is mergeable with master - not the old progressive_zl branch.
"imprint_masks_to_dds"
does'nt look good with variable zl even on 12.1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants