Syscheck_control not failing on invalid arguements

[goodshowsir]

I am running 2.8.1 and I was trying to manually run a integrity check on a client, i.e:

agent_control -r -u 001

But through my own stupidity I ran:

syscheck_control -r -u 001

Which in turn cleared the database for that client. Now I know it was my mistake but wouldn't you expect syscheck_control to fail as "-r -u" isn't on the available listed options?

[ddpbsd]

"-r" appears to be a valid option. How much time should be spent coding the logic to keep users from being able to shoot themselves in the foot?