You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What is the best way to check whether a .bim file is correctly formatted?
Up to now I have been testing if my files are correctly displayed in Online 3D Viewer.
I have been writing a reader/writer for .bim for my hobby project and I noticed that:
When indices is a list of lists instead of a flat list then Online 3D Viewer freezes and never displays my file, but at the same time there is no error displayed. I know the error was on my side, but it took my a while to find it.
schema_version is ignored in Online 3D Viewer. It can contain any string. It is unclear what are the available versions which are recognized by tools. I think the documentation mentions 1.0.0 and 1.1.0. The only difference I noticed is the use of optional face_colors. But dotbimpy is ignoring schema_version and just looks if face_colors are present or not.
It could be useful to have a function like dotbim_health_status(path_to_file) which would e.g.:
print errors if some obligatory keys are missing,
print errors if the format of the obligatory values is incorrect (e.g. lists need to be flat, schema_version need to be recognizable),
print warnings if there are meshes not referenced by any of the elements,
print warnings if there are elements referencing non-existent meshes,
print warnings if there are coordinates not referenced in indices.
Is there anything like this?
I am pretty sure there is not in dotbimpy, but maybe in some other project of yours?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You are absolutely right, this request for some automatic checker exist and from time to time I remind myself about it, I even created a reminder right there: paireks/dotbim#34, but still I haven't started it yet.
Right now when someone is creating a .bim builder I always try to help as much as I can, and try to verify the files myself on some platforms, manually. So you can send me on email or here some .bim files, I will try to check if something is wrong, or if something could be better :)
Automatic verification system would be great. Maybe it won't catch all the potential problems, but there are some that could be verified for sure!
If you'd like to check your files: feel free to send it to me to check, and if you'd like to try to build dotbim_health_status here - I would be also happy with such contribution :)
Hi @paireks ! Thanks for your work on .bim!
What is the best way to check whether a .bim file is correctly formatted?
Up to now I have been testing if my files are correctly displayed in Online 3D Viewer.
I have been writing a reader/writer for .bim for my hobby project and I noticed that:
indices
is a list of lists instead of a flat list then Online 3D Viewer freezes and never displays my file, but at the same time there is no error displayed. I know the error was on my side, but it took my a while to find it.schema_version
is ignored in Online 3D Viewer. It can contain any string. It is unclear what are the available versions which are recognized by tools. I think the documentation mentions 1.0.0 and 1.1.0. The only difference I noticed is the use of optionalface_colors
. Butdotbimpy
is ignoringschema_version
and just looks ifface_colors
are present or not.It could be useful to have a function like
dotbim_health_status(path_to_file)
which would e.g.:schema_version
need to be recognizable),elements
,coordinates
not referenced inindices
.Is there anything like this?
I am pretty sure there is not in
dotbimpy
, but maybe in some other project of yours?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: