You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the Panosc Data Policy, we can see that we have:
PI (Principal Investigator)
experimental team
OpenAire is using DataCite metadata standard for harvesting metadata. In DataCite, we have
Creator: The main researchers involved working on the data, or the authors of the publication in priority order.
This means the PI should be the first one then followed by the experimental team.
Within Expands, the data policy and the data management processes are part of WP2. We are having regular meetings with WP2 so I can ask their view on using Datacite metadata standard as a reference.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just had a meeting with Expands WP2, we will be initially including Dublin Core into the Expands ontology. This means it will contain only creator and contributor. The specification of this ontology can be find here: https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/
We will have only feedback about "high level" roles after the data policy will be published in August.
In the Panosc Data Policy, we can see that we have:
PI (Principal Investigator)
experimental team
OpenAire is using DataCite metadata standard for harvesting metadata. In DataCite, we have
Creator: The main researchers involved working on the data, or the authors of the publication in priority order.
This means the PI should be the first one then followed by the experimental team.
Contributor: The institution or person responsible for collecting, creating, or otherwise contributing to the developement of the dataset. Here there is a controlled vocabulary list:
https://guidelines.openaire.eu/en/latest/data/field_contributor.html
More details can be found here: https://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.3/doc/DataCite-MetadataKernel_v4.3.pdf
Annex 1 p.32
Within Expands, the data policy and the data management processes are part of WP2. We are having regular meetings with WP2 so I can ask their view on using Datacite metadata standard as a reference.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: