Skip to content

DualListSelector/TreeView/Form - remove opt-in animation logic #11838

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
thatblindgeye opened this issue May 21, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

DualListSelector/TreeView/Form - remove opt-in animation logic #11838

thatblindgeye opened this issue May 21, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
Breaking change 💥 this change requires a major release and has API changes. PF Team

Comments

@thatblindgeye
Copy link
Contributor

thatblindgeye commented May 21, 2025

Describe the enhancement or change
In the next breaking change release, we need to remove the opt-in logic for animations in these components so that animations are on by default. This will include at least removing any hasAnimations prop as well as ensuring any children are rendered always (rather than only when a parent item isExpanded).

Applicable PRs:

Is this request originating from a Red Hat product team? If so, which ones and is there any sort of deadline for this enhancement?

Any other information?

@thatblindgeye thatblindgeye added this to the Breaking Changes milestone May 21, 2025
@thatblindgeye thatblindgeye added the Breaking change 💥 this change requires a major release and has API changes. label May 21, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Needs triage in PatternFly Issues May 21, 2025
@thatblindgeye thatblindgeye changed the title DualListSelector/TreeView - remove opt-in animation logic DualListSelector/TreeView/Form - remove opt-in animation logic May 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Breaking change 💥 this change requires a major release and has API changes. PF Team
Projects
Status: Needs triage
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant