Replies: 3 comments 3 replies
-
I went ahead and created them based on my preference since I knew to use the org template. Depending on the results of the discussion anyone can now update the names to reflect the decision. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I’m ok with this - I agree each sub package will have both Adapter and Platform components so the naming should be terser. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
What version should those packages start? 1.0.x? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
@simon-mundy @settermjd
At the moment we have two proposed naming schema for the satellite packages they are as follows.
Personally, I prefer laminas-db-mysql where that package contains code relevant to both extensions to reduce the number of packages and to isolate them based on the rdbms platform rather than by required extension.
Can everyone please respond with their thoughts so someone can create the required repo's since Simon is ready to move on this.
Thanks :)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions