Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

review Hacking Plone training from 2018, decide if should be included in training repo #915

Open
tkimnguyen opened this issue Jan 26, 2025 · 5 comments

Comments

@tkimnguyen
Copy link
Member

See #906

This training was given in 2018. It shows how to do many things "through the web" ("TTW"), including creating Dexterity content types and creating a custom workflow via the (Zope) Management Interface.

It should still apply without modification to Plone Classic, and could be updated to include a section on how to use it with Volto.

Should this be included in the training repo?

Hacking Plone_ Workflow Applications.pdf

@stevepiercy
Copy link
Contributor

Do you mean this archived training? https://2022.training.plone.org/ttw/index.html

@tkimnguyen
Copy link
Member Author

tkimnguyen commented Jan 27, 2025

That’s not exactly what I have in 2018. I can’t tell yet(?) who committed that ttw training.

@stevepiercy
Copy link
Contributor

You can look on the branch 2022 and use git blame.

https://github.com/plone/training/tree/2022/docs

@tkimnguyen
Copy link
Member Author

The history is cut off... don't see stuff earlier than early 2023, and don't see the initial commit https://github.com/plone/training/commits/2022/docs/ttw/workflow.md

@stevepiercy
Copy link
Contributor

Follow the white rabbit.

ce1ae5d

Keep in mind that there were two major changes in Training, conversion from .rst to .md, then moving the docs into a subfolder. You'll need to trace backward from those changes to find the original author. You'll find it. I know you can do it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants