Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check how the operations on shapes follow the semantics described in DE-9IM model #18

Open
vitcpp opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@vitcpp
Copy link
Contributor

vitcpp commented Jun 23, 2023

There is DE-9IM topological model that defines the semantics of operations on shapes for 2D. This model defines the semantics of such operations as overlap, intersect, within and others for 2D shapes. Not sure, is there any such model for spherical coordinates. If not, this model would be applicable to our case.

In general, it would be nice to have the API that is aligned with some standards. For example, should operation overlap check for touches or not? Such things are defined in the model that introduces the clear semantics for each operation.

@vitcpp vitcpp changed the title Check how the operations on shapes follow the semantics described in DE-9IM model (or another model for spherical coordinates if any) Check how the operations on shapes follow the semantics described in DE-9IM model Jun 23, 2023
@3Davydov
Copy link
Contributor

3Davydov commented Aug 1, 2023

This is a report on correspondence of the contains and overlaps operators of the DE-9IM model :
PG_SPHERE vs DE-9IM eng.pdf

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants