You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is DE-9IM topological model that defines the semantics of operations on shapes for 2D. This model defines the semantics of such operations as overlap, intersect, within and others for 2D shapes. Not sure, is there any such model for spherical coordinates. If not, this model would be applicable to our case.
In general, it would be nice to have the API that is aligned with some standards. For example, should operation overlap check for touches or not? Such things are defined in the model that introduces the clear semantics for each operation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
vitcpp
changed the title
Check how the operations on shapes follow the semantics described in DE-9IM model (or another model for spherical coordinates if any)
Check how the operations on shapes follow the semantics described in DE-9IM model
Jun 23, 2023
There is DE-9IM topological model that defines the semantics of operations on shapes for 2D. This model defines the semantics of such operations as overlap, intersect, within and others for 2D shapes. Not sure, is there any such model for spherical coordinates. If not, this model would be applicable to our case.
In general, it would be nice to have the API that is aligned with some standards. For example, should operation overlap check for touches or not? Such things are defined in the model that introduces the clear semantics for each operation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: