You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My team and I (especially @Arqu1100) have been working on energy-dependent convolutions for a nuclear physics application. Such a convolution is useful for incorporating beam resolution (which varies by energy) into predicted data. An identical varying-kernel convolution is used in astronomy to match spectra resolution across energy ranges.
Community Partnerships
We partner with communities to support peer review with an additional layer of
checks that satisfy community requirements. If your package fits into an
existing community please check below:
Explain how and why the package falls under these categories (briefly, 1-2 sentences). For community partnerships, check also their specific guidelines as documented in the links above. Please note any areas you are unsure of:
This is a scientific software wrapper for a convolution that is useful to the nuclear physics community.
Who is the target audience and what are the scientific applications of this package?
The target audience is the nuclear beam physics community. The specific application of this package is to improve R-matrix fits by more accurately representing what the experimental data would look like.
Are there other Python packages that accomplish similar things? If so, how does yours differ?
There is another python package that does a similar thing, ppfx. It is available on PyPi at https://pypi.org/project/ppxf/, specifically the varsmooth function. This is incorporated into SDSS-Mangadap (https://sdss-mangadap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/resolution.html). The issue is that these libraries are very difficult to find when coming from the nuclear physics community.
Any other questions or issues we should be aware of:
My main question is whether this package is in scope for PyOpenSci.
P.S. Have feedback/comments about our review process? Leave a comment here
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Submitting Author: Name (@github_handle)
Package Name:
One-Line Description of Package:
Repository Link (if existing):
EiC: @coatless
Code of Conduct & Commitment to Maintain Package
Description
My team and I (especially @Arqu1100) have been working on energy-dependent convolutions for a nuclear physics application. Such a convolution is useful for incorporating beam resolution (which varies by energy) into predicted data. An identical varying-kernel convolution is used in astronomy to match spectra resolution across energy ranges.
Community Partnerships
We partner with communities to support peer review with an additional layer of
checks that satisfy community requirements. If your package fits into an
existing community please check below:
Scope
Please indicate which category or categories this package falls under:
Domain Specific
This is a scientific software wrapper for a convolution that is useful to the nuclear physics community.
The target audience is the nuclear beam physics community. The specific application of this package is to improve R-matrix fits by more accurately representing what the experimental data would look like.
There is another python package that does a similar thing,
ppfx
. It is available on PyPi at https://pypi.org/project/ppxf/, specifically thevarsmooth
function. This is incorporated into SDSS-Mangadap (https://sdss-mangadap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/resolution.html). The issue is that these libraries are very difficult to find when coming from the nuclear physics community.My main question is whether this package is in scope for PyOpenSci.
P.S. Have feedback/comments about our review process? Leave a comment here
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: