Potential extension to compute_log_probs
to facilitate VI model diagnostics
#1939
Labels
question
Further information is requested
It often happens that you want to diagnose a VI fit, specifically examining how well the guide fits the prior, the data, etc. So far, I've been using a function like the following but would be interested to know if there are better established alternatives and, if not, whether it would be an appropriate as a backwards compatible extension to the newly introduced (and very useful)
compute_log_probs
function (or perhaps as a separate function).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: