Pytest-BDD: the BDD framework for pytest

pytest-bdd implements a subset of the Gherkin language to enable automating project requirements testing and to facilitate behavioral driven development.

Unlike many other BDD tools, it does not require a separate runner and benefits from the power and flexibility of pytest. It enables unifying unit and functional tests, reduces the burden of continuous integration server configuration and allows the reuse of test setups.

Pytest fixtures written for unit tests can be reused for setup and actions mentioned in feature steps with dependency injection. This allows a true BDD just-enough specification of the requirements without maintaining any context object containing the side effects of Gherkin imperative declarations.

Install pytest-bdd

pip install pytest-bdd

Example

An example test for a blog hosting software could look like this. Note that pytest-splinter is used to get the browser fixture.

# content of publish_article.feature

Feature: Blog
    A site where you can publish your articles.

    Scenario: Publishing the article
        Given I'm an author user
        And I have an article

        When I go to the article page
        And I press the publish button

        Then I should not see the error message
        And the article should be published

Note that only one feature is allowed per feature file.

# content of test_publish_article.py

from pytest_bdd import scenario, given, when, then

@scenario('publish_article.feature', 'Publishing the article')
def test_publish():
    pass


@given("I'm an author user")
def author_user(auth, author):
    auth['user'] = author.user


@given("I have an article", target_fixture="article")
def article(author):
    return create_test_article(author=author)


@when("I go to the article page")
def go_to_article(article, browser):
    browser.visit(urljoin(browser.url, '/manage/articles/{0}/'.format(article.id)))


@when("I press the publish button")
def publish_article(browser):
    browser.find_by_css('button[name=publish]').first.click()


@then("I should not see the error message")
def no_error_message(browser):
    with pytest.raises(ElementDoesNotExist):
        browser.find_by_css('.message.error').first


@then("the article should be published")
def article_is_published(article):
    article.refresh()  # Refresh the object in the SQLAlchemy session
    assert article.is_published

Scenario decorator

Functions decorated with the scenario decorator behave like a normal test function, and they will be executed after all scenario steps.

from pytest_bdd import scenario, given, when, then

@scenario('publish_article.feature', 'Publishing the article')
def test_publish(browser):
    assert article.title in browser.html

Note

It is however encouraged to try as much as possible to have your logic only inside the Given, When, Then steps.

Step aliases

Sometimes, one has to declare the same fixtures or steps with different names for better readability. In order to use the same step function with multiple step names simply decorate it multiple times:

@given("I have an article")
@given("there's an article")
def article(author, target_fixture="article"):
    return create_test_article(author=author)

Note that the given step aliases are independent and will be executed when mentioned.

For example if you associate your resource to some owner or not. Admin user can’t be an author of the article, but articles should have a default author.

Feature: Resource owner
    Scenario: I'm the author
        Given I'm an author
        And I have an article


    Scenario: I'm the admin
        Given I'm the admin
        And there's an article

Using Asterisks in Place of Keywords

To avoid redundancy or unnecessary repetition of keywords such as "And" or "But" in Gherkin scenarios, you can use an asterisk (*) as a shorthand. The asterisk acts as a wildcard, allowing for the same functionality without repeating the keyword explicitly. It improves readability by making the steps easier to follow, especially when the specific keyword does not add value to the scenario's clarity.

The asterisk will work the same as other step keywords - Given, When, Then - it follows.

For example:

Feature: Resource owner
    Scenario: I'm the author
        Given I'm an author
        * I have an article
        * I have a pen

from pytest_bdd import given

@given("I'm an author")
def _():
    pass

@given("I have an article")
def _():
    pass

@given("I have a pen")
def _():
    pass

In the scenario above, the asterisk (*) replaces the And or Given keywords. This allows for cleaner scenarios while still linking related steps together in the context of the scenario.

This approach is particularly useful when you have a series of steps that do not require explicitly stating whether they are part of the "Given", "When", or "Then" context but are part of the logical flow of the scenario.

Step arguments

Often it's possible to reuse steps giving them a parameter(s). This allows to have single implementation and multiple use, so less code. Also opens the possibility to use same step twice in single scenario and with different arguments! And even more, there are several types of step parameter parsers at your disposal (idea taken from behave implementation):

string (the default): This is the default and can be considered as a null or exact parser. It parses no parameters and matches the step name by equality of strings.
parse (based on: pypi_parse): Provides a simple parser that replaces regular expressions for step parameters with a readable syntax like {param:Type}. The syntax is inspired by the Python builtin string.format() function. Step parameters must use the named fields syntax of pypi_parse in step definitions. The named fields are extracted, optionally type converted and then used as step function arguments. Supports type conversions by using type converters passed via extra_types
cfparse (extends: pypi_parse, based on: pypi_parse_type): Provides an extended parser with "Cardinality Field" (CF) support. Automatically creates missing type converters for related cardinality as long as a type converter for cardinality=1 is provided. Supports parse expressions like: * {values:Type+} (cardinality=1..N, many) * {values:Type*} (cardinality=0..N, many0) * {value:Type?} (cardinality=0..1, optional) Supports type conversions (as above).
re: This uses full regular expressions to parse the clause text. You will need to use named groups "(?P<name>...)" to define the variables pulled from the text and passed to your step() function. Type conversion can only be done via converters step decorator argument (see example below).

The default parser is string, so just plain one-to-one match to the keyword definition. Parsers except string, as well as their optional arguments are specified like:

for cfparse parser

from pytest_bdd import parsers

@given(
    parsers.cfparse("there are {start:Number} cucumbers", extra_types={"Number": int}),
    target_fixture="cucumbers",
)
def given_cucumbers(start):
    return {"start": start, "eat": 0}

for re parser

from pytest_bdd import parsers

@given(
    parsers.re(r"there are (?P<start>\d+) cucumbers"),
    converters={"start": int},
    target_fixture="cucumbers",
)
def given_cucumbers(start):
    return {"start": start, "eat": 0}

Example:

Feature: Step arguments
    Scenario: Arguments for given, when, then
        Given there are 5 cucumbers

        When I eat 3 cucumbers
        And I eat 2 cucumbers

        Then I should have 0 cucumbers

The code will look like:

from pytest_bdd import scenarios, given, when, then, parsers


scenarios("arguments.feature")


@given(parsers.parse("there are {start:d} cucumbers"), target_fixture="cucumbers")
def given_cucumbers(start):
    return {"start": start, "eat": 0}


@when(parsers.parse("I eat {eat:d} cucumbers"))
def eat_cucumbers(cucumbers, eat):
    cucumbers["eat"] += eat


@then(parsers.parse("I should have {left:d} cucumbers"))
def should_have_left_cucumbers(cucumbers, left):
    assert cucumbers["start"] - cucumbers["eat"] == left

Example code also shows possibility to pass argument converters which may be useful if you need to postprocess step arguments after the parser.

You can implement your own step parser. It's interface is quite simple. The code can look like:

import re
from pytest_bdd import given, parsers


class MyParser(parsers.StepParser):
    """Custom parser."""

    def __init__(self, name, **kwargs):
        """Compile regex."""
        super().__init__(name)
        self.regex = re.compile(re.sub("%(.+)%", "(?P<\1>.+)", self.name), **kwargs)

    def parse_arguments(self, name):
        """Get step arguments.

        :return: `dict` of step arguments
        """
        return self.regex.match(name).groupdict()

    def is_matching(self, name):
        """Match given name with the step name."""
        return bool(self.regex.match(name))


@given(parsers.parse("there are %start% cucumbers"), target_fixture="cucumbers")
def given_cucumbers(start):
    return {"start": start, "eat": 0}

Override fixtures via given steps

Dependency injection is not a panacea if you have complex structure of your test setup data. Sometimes there's a need such a given step which would imperatively change the fixture only for certain test (scenario), while for other tests it will stay untouched. To allow this, special parameter target_fixture exists in the given decorator:

from pytest_bdd import given

@pytest.fixture
def foo():
    return "foo"


@given("I have injecting given", target_fixture="foo")
def injecting_given():
    return "injected foo"


@then('foo should be "injected foo"')
def foo_is_foo(foo):
    assert foo == 'injected foo'

Feature: Target fixture
    Scenario: Test given fixture injection
        Given I have injecting given
        Then foo should be "injected foo"

In this example, the existing fixture foo will be overridden by given step I have injecting given only for the scenario it's used in.

Sometimes it is also useful to let when and then steps provide a fixture as well. A common use case is when we have to assert the outcome of an HTTP request:

# content of test_blog.py

from pytest_bdd import scenarios, given, when, then

from my_app.models import Article

scenarios("blog.feature")


@given("there is an article", target_fixture="article")
def there_is_an_article():
    return Article()


@when("I request the deletion of the article", target_fixture="request_result")
def there_should_be_a_new_article(article, http_client):
    return http_client.delete(f"/articles/{article.uid}")


@then("the request should be successful")
def article_is_published(request_result):
    assert request_result.status_code == 200

# content of blog.feature

Feature: Blog
    Scenario: Deleting the article
        Given there is an article

        When I request the deletion of the article

        Then the request should be successful

Scenarios shortcut

If you have a relatively large set of feature files, it's boring to manually bind scenarios to the tests using the scenario decorator. Of course with the manual approach you get all the power to be able to additionally parametrize the test, give the test function a nice name, document it, etc, but in the majority of the cases you don't need that. Instead, you want to bind all the scenarios found in the features folder(s) recursively automatically, by using the scenarios helper.

from pytest_bdd import scenarios

# assume 'features' subfolder is in this file's directory
scenarios('features')

That's all you need to do to bind all scenarios found in the features folder! Note that you can pass multiple paths, and those paths can be either feature files or feature folders.

from pytest_bdd import scenarios

# pass multiple paths/files
scenarios('features', 'other_features/some.feature', 'some_other_features')

But what if you need to manually bind a certain scenario, leaving others to be automatically bound? Just write your scenario in a "normal" way, but ensure you do it before the call of scenarios helper.

from pytest_bdd import scenario, scenarios

@scenario('features/some.feature', 'Test something')
def test_something():
    pass

# assume 'features' subfolder is in this file's directory
scenarios('features')

In the example above, the test_something scenario binding will be kept manual, other scenarios found in the features folder will be bound automatically.

Scenario outlines

Scenarios can be parametrized to cover multiple cases. These are called Scenario Outlines in Gherkin, and the variable templates are written using angular brackets (e.g. <var_name>).

Example:

# content of scenario_outlines.feature

Feature: Scenario outlines
    Scenario Outline: Outlined given, when, then
        Given there are <start> cucumbers
        When I eat <eat> cucumbers
        Then I should have <left> cucumbers

        Examples:
        | start | eat | left |
        |  12   |  5  |  7   |

from pytest_bdd import scenarios, given, when, then, parsers


scenarios("scenario_outlines.feature")


@given(parsers.parse("there are {start:d} cucumbers"), target_fixture="cucumbers")
def given_cucumbers(start):
    return {"start": start, "eat": 0}


@when(parsers.parse("I eat {eat:d} cucumbers"))
def eat_cucumbers(cucumbers, eat):
    cucumbers["eat"] += eat


@then(parsers.parse("I should have {left:d} cucumbers"))
def should_have_left_cucumbers(cucumbers, left):
    assert cucumbers["start"] - cucumbers["eat"] == left

Rules

In Gherkin, Rules allow you to group related scenarios or examples under a shared context. This is useful when you want to define different conditions or behaviours for multiple examples that follow a similar structure. You can use either Scenario or Example to define individual cases, as they are aliases and function identically.

Additionally, tags applied to a rule will be automatically applied to all the examples or scenarios under that rule, making it easier to organize and filter tests during execution.

Example:

Feature: Rules and examples

    @feature_tag
    Rule: A rule for valid cases

        @rule_tag
        Example: Valid case 1
            Given I have a valid input
            When I process the input
            Then the result should be successful

    Rule: A rule for invalid cases
        Example: Invalid case
            Given I have an invalid input
            When I process the input
            Then the result should be an error

Scenario Outlines with Multiple Example Tables

In pytest-bdd, you can use multiple example tables in a scenario outline to test different sets of input data under various conditions. You can define separate Examples blocks, each with its own table of data, and optionally tag them to differentiate between positive, negative, or any other conditions.

Example:

# content of scenario_outline.feature

Feature: Scenario outlines with multiple examples tables
    Scenario Outline: Outlined with multiple example tables
        Given there are <start> cucumbers
        When I eat <eat> cucumbers
        Then I should have <left> cucumbers

        @positive
        Examples: Positive results
            | start | eat | left |
            |  12   |  5  |  7   |
            |  5    |  4  |  1   |

        @negative
        Examples: Impossible negative results
            | start | eat | left |
            |  3    |  9  |  -6  |
            |  1    |  4  |  -3  |

from pytest_bdd import scenarios, given, when, then, parsers


scenarios("scenario_outline.feature")


@given(parsers.parse("there are {start:d} cucumbers"), target_fixture="cucumbers")
def given_cucumbers(start):
    return {"start": start, "eat": 0}


@when(parsers.parse("I eat {eat:d} cucumbers"))
def eat_cucumbers(cucumbers, eat):
    cucumbers["eat"] += eat


@then(parsers.parse("I should have {left:d} cucumbers"))
def should_have_left_cucumbers(cucumbers, left):
    assert cucumbers["start"] - cucumbers["eat"] == left

When you filter scenarios by a tag, only the examples associated with that tag will be executed. This allows you to run a specific subset of your test cases based on the tag. For example, in the following scenario outline, if you filter by the @positive tag, only the examples under the "Positive results" table will be executed, and the "Negative results" table will be ignored.

pytest -k "positive"

Datatables

The datatable argument allows you to utilise data tables defined in your Gherkin scenarios directly within your test functions. This is particularly useful for scenarios that require tabular data as input, enabling you to manage and manipulate this data conveniently.

When you use the datatable argument in a step definition, it will return the table as a list of lists, where each inner list represents a row from the table.

For example, the Gherkin table:

| name  | email            |
| John  | john@example.com |

Will be returned by the datatable argument as:

[
    ["name", "email"],
    ["John", "john@example.com"]
]

Note

When using the datatable argument, it is essential to ensure that the step to which it is applied actually has an associated data table. If the step does not have an associated data table, attempting to use the datatable argument will raise an error. Make sure that your Gherkin steps correctly reference the data table when defined.

Full example:

Feature: Manage user accounts

  Scenario: Creating a new user with roles and permissions
    Given the following user details:
      | name  | email             | age |
      | John  | john@example.com  | 30  |
      | Alice | alice@example.com | 25  |

    When each user is assigned the following roles:
      | Admin       | Full access to the system |
      | Contributor | Can add content           |

    And the page is saved

    Then the user should have the following permissions:
      | permission     | allowed |
      | view dashboard | true    |
      | edit content   | true    |
      | delete content | false   |

from pytest_bdd import given, when, then


@given("the following user details:", target_fixture="users")
def _(datatable):
    users = []
    for row in datatable[1:]:
        users.append(row)

    print(users)
    return users


@when("each user is assigned the following roles:")
def _(datatable, users):
    roles = datatable
    for user in users:
        for role_row in datatable:
            assign_role(user, role_row)


@when("the page is saved")
def _():
    save_page()


@then("the user should have the following permissions:")
def _(datatable, users):
    expected_permissions = []
    for row in datatable[1:]:
        expected_permissions.append(row)

    assert users_have_correct_permissions(users, expected_permissions)

Docstrings

The docstring argument allows you to access the Gherkin docstring defined in your steps as a multiline string. The content of the docstring is passed as a single string, with each line separated by \n. Leading indentation are stripped.

For example, the Gherkin docstring:

"""
This is a sample docstring.
It spans multiple lines.
"""

Will be returned as:

"This is a sample docstring.\nIt spans multiple lines."

Full example:

Feature: Docstring

  Scenario: Step with docstrings
    Given some steps will have docstrings

    Then a step has a docstring
    """
    This is a docstring
    on two lines
    """

    And a step provides a docstring with lower indentation
    """
This is a docstring
    """

    And this step has no docstring

    And this step has a greater indentation
    """
        This is a docstring
    """

    And this step has no docstring

from pytest_bdd import given, then


@given("some steps will have docstrings")
def _():
    pass

@then("a step has a docstring")
def _(docstring):
    assert docstring == "This is a docstring\non two lines"

@then("a step provides a docstring with lower indentation")
def _(docstring):
    assert docstring == "This is a docstring"

@then("this step has a greater indentation")
def _(docstring):
    assert docstring == "This is a docstring"

@then("this step has no docstring")
def _():
    pass

Note

The docstring argument can only be used for steps that have an associated docstring. Otherwise, an error will be thrown.

Organizing your scenarios

The more features and scenarios you have, the more important the question of their organization becomes. The things you can do (and that is also a recommended way):

organize your feature files in the folders by semantic groups:

features
│
├──frontend
│  │
│  └──auth
│     │
│     └──login.feature
└──backend
   │
   └──auth
      │
      └──login.feature

This looks fine, but how do you run tests only for a certain feature? As pytest-bdd uses pytest, and bdd scenarios are actually normal tests. But test files are separate from the feature files, the mapping is up to developers, so the test files structure can look completely different:

tests
│
└──functional
   │
   └──test_auth.py
      │
      └ """Authentication tests."""
        from pytest_bdd import scenario

        @scenario('frontend/auth/login.feature')
        def test_logging_in_frontend():
            pass

        @scenario('backend/auth/login.feature')
        def test_logging_in_backend():
            pass

For picking up tests to run we can use the tests selection technique. The problem is that you have to know how your tests are organized, knowing only the feature files organization is not enough. Cucumber uses tags as a way of categorizing your features and scenarios, which pytest-bdd supports. For example, we could have:

@login @backend
Feature: Login

  @successful
  Scenario: Successful login

pytest-bdd uses pytest markers as a storage of the tags for the given scenario test, so we can use standard test selection:

pytest -m "backend and login and successful"

The feature and scenario markers are not different from standard pytest markers, and the @ symbol is stripped out automatically to allow test selector expressions. If you want to have bdd-related tags to be distinguishable from the other test markers, use a prefix like bdd. Note that if you use pytest with the --strict-markers option, all Gherkin tags mentioned in the feature files should be also in the markers setting of the pytest.ini config. Also for tags please use names which are python-compatible variable names, i.e. start with a non-number, only underscores or alphanumeric characters, etc. That way you can safely use tags for tests filtering.

You can customize how tags are converted to pytest marks by implementing the pytest_bdd_apply_tag hook and returning True from it:

def pytest_bdd_apply_tag(tag, function):
    if tag == 'todo':
        marker = pytest.mark.skip(reason="Not implemented yet")
        marker(function)
        return True
    else:
        # Fall back to the default behavior of pytest-bdd
        return None

Test setup

Test setup is implemented within the Given section. Even though these steps are executed imperatively to apply possible side-effects, pytest-bdd is trying to benefit of the PyTest fixtures which is based on the dependency injection and makes the setup more declarative style.

@given("I have a beautiful article", target_fixture="article")
def article():
    return Article(is_beautiful=True)

The target PyTest fixture "article" gets the return value and any other step can depend on it.

Feature: The power of PyTest
    Scenario: Symbolic name across steps
        Given I have a beautiful article
        When I publish this article

The When step is referencing the article to publish it.

@when("I publish this article")
def publish_article(article):
    article.publish()

Many other BDD toolkits operate on a global context and put the side effects there. This makes it very difficult to implement the steps, because the dependencies appear only as the side-effects during run-time and not declared in the code. The "publish article" step has to trust that the article is already in the context, has to know the name of the attribute it is stored there, the type etc.

In pytest-bdd you just declare an argument of the step function that it depends on and the PyTest will make sure to provide it.

Still side effects can be applied in the imperative style by design of the BDD.

Feature: News website
    Scenario: Publishing an article
        Given I have a beautiful article
        And my article is published

Functional tests can reuse your fixture libraries created for the unit-tests and upgrade them by applying the side effects.

@pytest.fixture
def article():
    return Article(is_beautiful=True)


@given("I have a beautiful article")
def i_have_a_beautiful_article(article):
    pass


@given("my article is published")
def published_article(article):
    article.publish()
    return article

This way side-effects were applied to our article and PyTest makes sure that all steps that require the "article" fixture will receive the same object. The value of the "published_article" and the "article" fixtures is the same object.

Fixtures are evaluated only once within the PyTest scope and their values are cached.

Backgrounds

It's often the case that to cover certain feature, you'll need multiple scenarios. And it's logical that the setup for those scenarios will have some common parts (if not equal). For this, there are backgrounds. pytest-bdd implements Gherkin backgrounds for features.

Feature: Multiple site support

  Background:
    Given a global administrator named "Greg"
    And a blog named "Greg's anti-tax rants"
    And a customer named "Wilson"
    And a blog named "Expensive Therapy" owned by "Wilson"

  Scenario: Wilson posts to his own blog
    Given I am logged in as Wilson
    When I try to post to "Expensive Therapy"
    Then I should see "Your article was published."

  Scenario: Greg posts to a client's blog
    Given I am logged in as Greg
    When I try to post to "Expensive Therapy"
    Then I should see "Your article was published."

In this example, all steps from the background will be executed before all the scenario's own given steps, adding a possibility to prepare some common setup for multiple scenarios in a single feature. About best practices for Background, please read Gherkin's Tips for using Background.

Note

Only "Given" steps should be used in "Background" section. Steps "When" and "Then" are prohibited, because their purposes are related to actions and consuming outcomes; that is in conflict with the aim of "Background" - to prepare the system for tests or "put the system in a known state" as "Given" does it.

Reusing fixtures

Sometimes scenarios define new names for an existing fixture that can be inherited (reused). For example, if we have the pytest fixture:

@pytest.fixture
def article():
   """Test article."""
   return Article()

Then this fixture can be reused with other names using given():

@given('I have a beautiful article')
def i_have_an_article(article):
   """I have an article."""

Reusing steps

It is possible to define some common steps in the parent conftest.py and simply expect them in the child test file.

# content of common_steps.feature

Scenario: All steps are declared in the conftest
    Given I have a bar
    Then bar should have value "bar"

# content of conftest.py

from pytest_bdd import given, then


@given("I have a bar", target_fixture="bar")
def bar():
    return "bar"


@then('bar should have value "bar"')
def bar_is_bar(bar):
    assert bar == "bar"

# content of test_common.py

@scenario("common_steps.feature", "All steps are declared in the conftest")
def test_conftest():
    pass

There are no definitions of steps in the test file. They were collected from the parent conftest.py.

Default steps

Here is the list of steps that are implemented inside pytest-bdd:

given

trace - enters the pdb debugger via pytest.set_trace()

when

trace - enters the pdb debugger via pytest.set_trace()

then

trace - enters the pdb debugger via pytest.set_trace()

Feature file paths

By default, pytest-bdd will use the current module's path as the base path for finding feature files, but this behaviour can be changed in the pytest configuration file (i.e. pytest.ini, tox.ini or setup.cfg) by declaring the new base path in the bdd_features_base_dir key. The path is interpreted as relative to the pytest root directory. You can also override the features base path on a per-scenario basis, in order to override the path for specific tests.

pytest.ini:

[pytest]
bdd_features_base_dir = features/

tests/test_publish_article.py:

from pytest_bdd import scenario


@scenario("foo.feature", "Foo feature in features/foo.feature")
def test_foo():
    pass


@scenario(
    "foo.feature",
    "Foo feature in tests/local-features/foo.feature",
    features_base_dir="./local-features/",
)
def test_foo_local():
    pass

The features_base_dir parameter can also be passed to the @scenario decorator.

Avoid retyping the feature file name

If you want to avoid retyping the feature file name when defining your scenarios in a test file, use functools.partial. This will make your life much easier when defining multiple scenarios in a test file. For example:

# content of test_publish_article.py

from functools import partial

import pytest_bdd


scenario = partial(pytest_bdd.scenario, "/path/to/publish_article.feature")


@scenario("Publishing the article")
def test_publish():
    pass


@scenario("Publishing the article as unprivileged user")
def test_publish_unprivileged():
    pass

You can learn more about functools.partial in the Python docs.

Programmatic step generation

Sometimes you have step definitions that would be much easier to automate rather than writing them manually over and over again. This is common, for example, when using libraries like pytest-factoryboy that automatically creates fixtures. Writing step definitions for every model can become a tedious task.

For this reason, pytest-bdd provides a way to generate step definitions automatically.

The trick is to pass the stacklevel parameter to the given, when, then, step decorators. This will instruct them to inject the step fixtures in the appropriate module, rather than just injecting them in the caller frame.

Let's look at a concrete example; let's say you have a class Wallet that has some amount of each currency:

# contents of wallet.py

import dataclass

@dataclass
class Wallet:
    verified: bool

    amount_eur: int
    amount_usd: int
    amount_gbp: int
    amount_jpy: int

You can use pytest-factoryboy to automatically create model fixtures for this class:

# contents of wallet_factory.py

from wallet import Wallet

import factory
from pytest_factoryboy import register

class WalletFactory(factory.Factory):
    class Meta:
        model = Wallet

    amount_eur = 0
    amount_usd = 0
    amount_gbp = 0
    amount_jpy = 0

register(Wallet)  # creates the "wallet" fixture
register(Wallet, "second_wallet")  # creates the "second_wallet" fixture

Now we can define a function generate_wallet_steps(...) that creates the steps for any wallet fixture (in our case, it will be wallet and second_wallet):

# contents of wallet_steps.py

import re
from dataclasses import fields

import factory
import pytest
from pytest_bdd import given, when, then, scenarios, parsers


def generate_wallet_steps(model_name="wallet", stacklevel=1):
    stacklevel += 1

    human_name = model_name.replace("_", " ")  # "second_wallet" -> "second wallet"

    @given(f"I have a {human_name}", target_fixture=model_name, stacklevel=stacklevel)
    def _(request):
        return request.getfixturevalue(model_name)

    # Generate steps for currency fields:
    for field in fields(Wallet):
        match = re.fullmatch(r"amount_(?P<currency>[a-z]{3})", field.name)
        if not match:
            continue
        currency = match["currency"]

        @given(
            parsers.parse(f"I have {{value:d}} {currency.upper()} in my {human_name}"),
            target_fixture=f"{model_name}__amount_{currency}",
            stacklevel=stacklevel,
        )
        def _(value: int) -> int:
            return value

        @then(
            parsers.parse(f"I should have {{value:d}} {currency.upper()} in my {human_name}"),
            stacklevel=stacklevel,
        )
        def _(value: int, _currency=currency, _model_name=model_name) -> None:
            wallet = request.getfixturevalue(_model_name)
            assert getattr(wallet, f"amount_{_currency}") == value

# Inject the steps into the current module
generate_wallet_steps("wallet")
generate_wallet_steps("second_wallet")

This last file, wallet_steps.py, now contains all the step definitions for our "wallet" and "second_wallet" fixtures.

We can now define a scenario like this:

# contents of wallet.feature
Feature: A feature

    Scenario: Wallet EUR amount stays constant
        Given I have 10 EUR in my wallet
        And I have a wallet
        Then I should have 10 EUR in my wallet

    Scenario: Second wallet JPY amount stays constant
        Given I have 100 JPY in my second wallet
        And I have a second wallet
        Then I should have 100 JPY in my second wallet

and finally a test file that puts it all together and run the scenarios:

# contents of test_wallet.py

from pytest_factoryboy import scenarios

from wallet_factory import *  # import the registered fixtures "wallet" and "second_wallet"
from wallet_steps import *  # import all the step definitions into this test file

scenarios("wallet.feature")

Hooks

pytest-bdd exposes several pytest hooks which might be helpful building useful reporting, visualization, etc. on top of it:

pytest_bdd_before_scenario(request, feature, scenario) - Called before scenario is executed
pytest_bdd_after_scenario(request, feature, scenario) - Called after scenario is executed (even if one of steps has failed)
pytest_bdd_before_step(request, feature, scenario, step, step_func) - Called before step function is executed and its arguments evaluated
pytest_bdd_before_step_call(request, feature, scenario, step, step_func, step_func_args) - Called before step function is executed with evaluated arguments
pytest_bdd_after_step(request, feature, scenario, step, step_func, step_func_args) - Called after step function is successfully executed
pytest_bdd_step_error(request, feature, scenario, step, step_func, step_func_args, exception) - Called when step function failed to execute
pytest_bdd_step_func_lookup_error(request, feature, scenario, step, exception) - Called when step lookup failed

Browser testing

Tools recommended to use for browser testing:

pytest-splinter - pytest splinter integration for the real browser testing

Reporting

It's important to have nice reporting out of your bdd tests. Cucumber introduced some kind of standard for json format which can be used for, for example, by this Jenkins plugin.

To have an output in json format:

pytest --cucumberjson=<path to json report>

This will output an expanded (meaning scenario outlines will be expanded to several scenarios) Cucumber format.

To enable gherkin-formatted output on terminal, use --gherkin-terminal-reporter in conjunction with the -v or -vv options:

pytest -v --gherkin-terminal-reporter

Test code generation helpers

For newcomers it's sometimes hard to write all needed test code without being frustrated. To simplify their life, a simple code generator was implemented. It allows to create fully functional (but of course empty) tests and step definitions for a given feature file. It's done as a separate console script provided by pytest-bdd package:

pytest-bdd generate <feature file name> .. <feature file nameN>

It will print the generated code to the standard output so you can easily redirect it to the file:

pytest-bdd generate features/some.feature > tests/functional/test_some.py

Advanced code generation

For more experienced users, there's a smart code generation/suggestion feature. It will only generate the test code which is not yet there, checking existing tests and step definitions the same way it's done during the test execution. The code suggestion tool is called via passing additional pytest arguments:

pytest --generate-missing --feature features tests/functional

The output will be like:

============================= test session starts ==============================
platform linux2 -- Python 2.7.6 -- py-1.4.24 -- pytest-2.6.2
plugins: xdist, pep8, cov, cache, bdd, bdd, bdd
collected 2 items

Scenario is not bound to any test: "Code is generated for scenarios which are not bound to any tests" in feature "Missing code generation" in /tmp/pytest-552/testdir/test_generate_missing0/tests/generation.feature
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Step is not defined: "I have a custom bar" in scenario: "Code is generated for scenario steps which are not yet defined(implemented)" in feature "Missing code generation" in /tmp/pytest-552/testdir/test_generate_missing0/tests/generation.feature
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please place the code above to the test file(s):

@scenario('tests/generation.feature', 'Code is generated for scenarios which are not bound to any tests')
def test_Code_is_generated_for_scenarios_which_are_not_bound_to_any_tests():
    """Code is generated for scenarios which are not bound to any tests."""


@given("I have a custom bar")
def I_have_a_custom_bar():
    """I have a custom bar."""

As as side effect, the tool will validate the files for format errors, also some of the logic bugs, for example the ordering of the types of the steps.

Migration of your tests from versions 5.x.x

The primary focus of the pytest-bdd is the compatibility with the latest gherkin developments e.g. multiple scenario outline example tables with tags support etc.

In order to provide the best compatibility, it is best to support the features described in the official gherkin reference. This means deprecation of some non-standard features that were implemented in pytest-bdd.

Removal of the feature examples

The example tables on the feature level are no longer supported. If you had examples on the feature level, you should copy them to each individual scenario.

Removal of the vertical examples

Vertical example tables are no longer supported since the official gherkin doesn't support them. The example tables should have horizontal orientation.

Step arguments are no longer fixtures

Step parsed arguments conflicted with the fixtures. Now they no longer define fixture. If the fixture has to be defined by the step, the target_fixture param should be used.

Variable templates in steps are only parsed for Scenario Outlines

In previous versions of pytest, steps containing <variable> would be parsed both by Scenario and Scenario Outline. Now they are only parsed within a Scenario Outline.

Migration of your tests from versions 4.x.x

Replace usage of <parameter> inside step definitions with parsed {parameter}

Templated steps (e.g. @given("there are <start> cucumbers")) should now the use step argument parsers in order to match the scenario outlines and get the values from the example tables. The values from the example tables are no longer passed as fixtures, although if you define your step to use a parser, the parameters will be still provided as fixtures.

# Old step definition:
@given("there are <start> cucumbers")
def given_cucumbers(start):
    pass


# New step definition:
@given(parsers.parse("there are {start} cucumbers"))
def given_cucumbers(start):
    pass

Scenario example_converters are removed in favor of the converters provided on the step level:

# Old code:
@given("there are <start> cucumbers")
def given_cucumbers(start):
    return {"start": start}

@scenario("outline.feature", "Outlined", example_converters={"start": float})
def test_outline():
    pass


# New code:
@given(parsers.parse("there are {start} cucumbers"), converters={"start": float})
def given_cucumbers(start):
    return {"start": start}

@scenario("outline.feature", "Outlined")
def test_outline():
    pass

Refuse combining scenario outline and pytest parametrization

The significant downside of combining scenario outline and pytest parametrization approach was an inability to see the test table from the feature file.

Migration of your tests from versions 3.x.x

Given steps are no longer fixtures. In case it is needed to make given step setup a fixture, the target_fixture parameter should be used.

@given("there's an article", target_fixture="article")
def there_is_an_article():
    return Article()

Given steps no longer have the fixture parameter. In fact the step may depend on multiple fixtures. Just normal step declaration with the dependency injection should be used.

@given("there's an article")
def there_is_an_article(article):
    pass

Strict gherkin option is removed, so the strict_gherkin parameter can be removed from the scenario decorators as well as bdd_strict_gherkin from the ini files.

Step validation handlers for the hook pytest_bdd_step_validation_error should be removed.

License

This software is licensed under the MIT License.

Files

README.rst

Latest commit

History

README.rst

File metadata and controls

Pytest-BDD: the BDD framework for pytest

Install pytest-bdd

Example

Scenario decorator

Step aliases

Using Asterisks in Place of Keywords

Step arguments

Override fixtures via given steps

Scenarios shortcut

Scenario outlines

Rules

Scenario Outlines with Multiple Example Tables

Datatables

Docstrings

Organizing your scenarios

Test setup

Backgrounds

Reusing fixtures

Reusing steps

Default steps

Feature file paths

Avoid retyping the feature file name

Programmatic step generation

Hooks

Browser testing

Reporting

Test code generation helpers

Advanced code generation

Migration of your tests from versions 5.x.x

Removal of the feature examples

Removal of the vertical examples

Step arguments are no longer fixtures

Variable templates in steps are only parsed for Scenario Outlines

Migration of your tests from versions 4.x.x

Replace usage of <parameter> inside step definitions with parsed {parameter}

Refuse combining scenario outline and pytest parametrization

Migration of your tests from versions 3.x.x

License