Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

question: Inquiry about unexpected URL in documentation #1603

Open
ryo-kagawa opened this issue Mar 3, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

question: Inquiry about unexpected URL in documentation #1603

ryo-kagawa opened this issue Mar 3, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@ryo-kagawa
Copy link

Git provider (optional)

None

System Info (optional)

No response

Issues details

Hello

I've noticed that the URL specified in the documentation is different from what I expected
I'd like to understand the reasoning behind this

Could you please explain the intention behind using this specific URL? Is there a particular reason for this choice, or is it possibly an oversight?

The JSON structure is equivalent to the yaml data structure defined in [pr_reviewer_prompts.toml](https://github.com/idubnori/pr-agent/blob/main/pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml).

Expected link: https://github.com/qodo-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml
Actual link: https://github.com/idubnori/pr-agent/blob/main/pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml

@ryo-kagawa ryo-kagawa added the general label Mar 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

💡 Auto-generated documentation-based answer:

Based on the documentation content, I cannot find the specific URL you're referring to in the current documentation. The documentation has likely been updated since your observation. The correct repository for PR-Agent (now Qodo Merge) is indeed under the qodo-ai organization.

If you're seeing references to other repositories or forks (like idubnori's fork), this is likely an oversight that should be updated to point to the official repository.

For the most up-to-date documentation and resources, you should use links pointing to:

Relevant Sources:

@ryo-kagawa
Copy link
Author

@mrT23
Copy link
Collaborator

mrT23 commented Mar 3, 2025

@ryo-kagawa
Thanks. a mistake.

you are welcome to open a PR and fix it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants