No CV release.

[zvezdochiot]

Hi @rageworx .

See stb-image-srcnn. This is your SRCNN implementation in C without OpenCV. Use stb.

Good luck.

[rageworx]

Thanks, But did you checked my older source code of libsrcnn ? https://github.com/rageworx/libsrcnn It doesn't use openCV, and testing source made for FLTK as my favorite GUI engine. Regards, Raph. 2023년 1월 4일 (수) 오후 11:09, звездочёт ***@***.***>님이 작성:

…

Hi @rageworx <https://github.com/rageworx> . See stb-image-srcnn <https://github.com/ImageProcessing-ElectronicPublications/stb-image-srcnn>. This is your SRCNN implementation in C without OpenCV. Use stb <https://github.com/nothings/stb.git>. Good luck. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#7>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABVALAKKQJS57HTMF7VQWWDWQWAAXANCNFSM6AAAAAATQ2X2OY> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[zvezdochiot]

@rageworx say:

But did you checked my older source code of libsrcnn ?

Yes, I checked. And it exactly repeats the original scheme with memory abuse. I reduced all the layers into one function, reducing the memory of CNN consumption to 32*resize_height*resize_width*sizeof(float) (== 43*resize_image). Total memory usage: source_image+resize_image+CNN=175*source_image=44*resize_image.

Good Luck.

[rageworx]

It was an issue that reported by you, so I made a new branch here,

• https://github.com/rageworx/SRCNN_OpenCV_GCC/tree/cnn-0
  Is it a different one ? ( except using OpenCV )
  As I remember, there's performance issue except less memory usage with openMP.
  I will check what's difference and cosider update libsrcnn instead this legacy project.

Regards, Raph.

ps
What meaning of Good Luck ? Something regarding way of your home ? Let me know.

[rageworx]

It will take long term by understanding codes again about 4 years ago.

[rageworx]

Closing this issue, follow this issue : rageworx/libsrcnn#10

[rageworx]

Appreciate to @zvezdochiot !