PhantomCamera2D "Framed" Function doesnt work

[DeliMysticShelter]

Hello,
i didn't really make anything special, i've got a phantom camera, which is attached to my rigidbody player, the phantom Camera is told to frame a 2d Maker which is a child of my player Rigidbody
It just ignores the Framing, it works exactly like i would use the "Glued" Function

Is this a known Bug?

[ramokz]

This is the first time I've heard about an issue like this. Can you share any more details about your setup?

[DeliMysticShelter]

Ofcourse! Thank you for answering!

My Camera2D is Child of the CharacterBody2D.
PhantomCameraHost is Child of the Camera2D.

A PhantomCamera is Child of the CharacterBody2D, in FrameMode is it supposed to follow a Marker2D, which is a Child of the CharacterBody2D.

The Camera2D has a Script for stuff like Screenshake, setting it's offsets

My Bigger Setup is to have various Phantom Cameras in my Level for different Zones, with the possibility to switch Priority to the PhantomCamera, which is Child of the CharacterBody2D.

[ramokz]

Can't immediately tell what the issue might be, but would recommend try to enable the Top Level property on the PCam2D and Camera2D nodes.

Mainly because the tree structure that you're describing suggests that it might be due to the PCam2D and Camera2D are child nodes of the CharacerBody2D. In general, they should be top-level nodes so they don't get moved around by their parent nodes, which can cause unwanted behavior. Enabling the Top Level property on the PCam2D and Camera2D should circumvent that.

[DeliMysticShelter]

This did work, thank you so much. And sorry for posting it as a Problem when my Scene was'nt set up properly.
With the Top Level Property checked, it does work as intended and helped me to not completely rearrange my Camera Setup.
Only thing i get now is the Problem of Framed Follow staying in the Offset Position when the Camera changes, but that's a known Bug and i already found another Discussion about it.

Thank you!

[ramokz]

No problem!
I had thought about applying this automatically, but there are a few use cases issues with doing that.
But sleeping on it some more, I think there's a way to avoid those issues and make it work out-of-the-box — so thanks for posting the question!