diff --git a/src/content/blog/2023/03/16/introducing-react-dev.md b/src/content/blog/2023/03/16/introducing-react-dev.md
index d27673d90..d2e11fded 100644
--- a/src/content/blog/2023/03/16/introducing-react-dev.md
+++ b/src/content/blog/2023/03/16/introducing-react-dev.md
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ export default function PackingList() {
 
 Note that you must write `importance > 0 && ...` rather than `importance && ...` so that if the `importance` is `0`, `0` isn't rendered as the result!
 
-In this solution, two separate conditions are used to insert a space between then name and the importance label. Alternatively, you could use a fragment with a leading space: `importance > 0 && <> <i>...</i></>` or add a space immediately inside the `<i>`:  `importance > 0 && <i> ...</i>`.
+In this solution, two separate conditions are used to insert a space between then name and the importance label. Alternatively, you could use a Fragment with a leading space: `importance > 0 && <> <i>...</i></>` or add a space immediately inside the `<i>`:  `importance > 0 && <i> ...</i>`.
 
 </Solution>
 
@@ -643,4 +643,3 @@ On the development front, thanks to [Jared Palmer](https://twitter.com/jaredpalm
 Huge thanks to the folks who volunteered their time to participate in the alpha and beta testing program. Your enthusiasm and invaluable feedback helped us shape these docs. A special shout out to our beta tester, [Debbie O'Brien](https://twitter.com/debs_obrien), who gave a talk about her experience using the React docs at React Conf 2021.
 
 Finally, thanks to the React community for being the inspiration behind this effort. You are the reason we do this, and we hope that the new docs will help you use React to build any user interface that you want.
-
diff --git a/src/content/learn/conditional-rendering.md b/src/content/learn/conditional-rendering.md
index cfd52320a..895d610d3 100644
--- a/src/content/learn/conditional-rendering.md
+++ b/src/content/learn/conditional-rendering.md
@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ export default function PackingList() {
 
 Note that you must write `importance > 0 && ...` rather than `importance && ...` so that if the `importance` is `0`, `0` isn't rendered as the result!
 
-In this solution, two separate conditions are used to insert a space between the name and the importance label. Alternatively, you could use a fragment with a leading space: `importance > 0 && <> <i>...</i></>` or add a space immediately inside the `<i>`:  `importance > 0 && <i> ...</i>`.
+In this solution, two separate conditions are used to insert a space between the name and the importance label. Alternatively, you could use a Fragment with a leading space: `importance > 0 && <> <i>...</i></>` or add a space immediately inside the `<i>`:  `importance > 0 && <i> ...</i>`.
 
 </Solution>
 
diff --git a/src/content/learn/rendering-lists.md b/src/content/learn/rendering-lists.md
index 13ac932fb..5b07afd93 100644
--- a/src/content/learn/rendering-lists.md
+++ b/src/content/learn/rendering-lists.md
@@ -1145,7 +1145,7 @@ hr {
 
 <Hint>
 
-You'll either need to convert `map` to a manual loop, or use a fragment.
+You'll either need to convert `map` to a manual loop, or use a Fragment.
 
 </Hint>
 
@@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@ hr {
 
 Using the original line index as a `key` doesn't work anymore because each separator and paragraph are now in the same array. However, you can give each of them a distinct key using a suffix, e.g. `key={i + '-text'}`.
 
-Alternatively, you could render a collection of fragments which contain `<hr />` and `<p>...</p>`. However, the `<>...</>` shorthand syntax doesn't support passing keys, so you'd have to write `<Fragment>` explicitly:
+Alternatively, you could render a collection of Fragments which contain `<hr />` and `<p>...</p>`. However, the `<>...</>` shorthand syntax doesn't support passing keys, so you'd have to write `<Fragment>` explicitly:
 
 <Sandpack>
 
@@ -1254,7 +1254,7 @@ hr {
 
 </Sandpack>
 
-Remember, fragments (often written as `<> </>`) let you group JSX nodes without adding extra `<div>`s!
+Remember, Fragments (often written as `<> </>`) let you group JSX nodes without adding extra `<div>`s!
 
 </Solution>
 
diff --git a/src/content/learn/tutorial-tic-tac-toe.md b/src/content/learn/tutorial-tic-tac-toe.md
index eca388a88..b40a90572 100644
--- a/src/content/learn/tutorial-tic-tac-toe.md
+++ b/src/content/learn/tutorial-tic-tac-toe.md
@@ -362,11 +362,11 @@ You'll get this error:
 
 <ConsoleBlock level="error">
 
-/src/App.js: Adjacent JSX elements must be wrapped in an enclosing tag. Did you want a JSX fragment `<>...</>`?
+/src/App.js: Adjacent JSX elements must be wrapped in an enclosing tag. Did you want a JSX Fragment `<>...</>`?
 
 </ConsoleBlock>
 
-React components need to return a single JSX element and not multiple adjacent JSX elements like two buttons. To fix this you can use *fragments* (`<>` and `</>`) to wrap multiple adjacent JSX elements like this:
+React components need to return a single JSX element and not multiple adjacent JSX elements like two buttons. To fix this you can use *Fragments* (`<>` and `</>`) to wrap multiple adjacent JSX elements like this:
 
 ```js {3-6}
 export default function Square() {