generated from riscv/docs-spec-template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify SMBIOS_080 for the case when there is no grouping #187
Labels
Comments
This is why it's should and not must. Do it unless there's a good reason not to. We could certainly conditionalize this. |
I'm actually tempted to just remove this requirement. |
andreiw
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 8, 2024
#185 #187 Signed-off-by: Andrei Warkentin <[email protected]>
Merged
andreiw
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 8, 2024
#185 #187 Signed-off-by: Andrei Warkentin <[email protected]>
andreiw
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 8, 2024
#185 #187 Signed-off-by: Andrei Warkentin <[email protected]>
andreiw
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 8, 2024
#185 #187 Signed-off-by: Andrei Warkentin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
For SMBIOS_080, should a Group Associations structure be implemented even when there are no groupings of anything? (For example, if there is only one of everything: processor, hart, cache, etc.?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: