Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

how about the quality of this net #5

Open
hdmjdp opened this issue Apr 26, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

how about the quality of this net #5

hdmjdp opened this issue Apr 26, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@hdmjdp
Copy link

hdmjdp commented Apr 26, 2022

Have you got good audio?

@rishikksh20
Copy link
Owner

yes better than hifi-gan with less training

@hdmjdp
Copy link
Author

hdmjdp commented Apr 26, 2022

yes better than hifi-gan with less training

but in my experiments, the stftnet has larger machine noise in the audio, did you have it?

also in the training, there is "max value is tensor(1.1451, device='cuda:0', grad_fn=)
" note

@ease-zh
Copy link

ease-zh commented Dec 25, 2023

also in the training, there is "max value is tensor(1.1451, device='cuda:0', grad_fn=) " note

Since no activation is applied to spec, only an exp to make it positive, its upper bound is unlimited, which causes an unlimited bound for the generated audio.
Leaving the spec unbounded is not a good idea.

@piplyman
Copy link

also in the training, there is "max value is tensor(1.1451, device='cuda:0', grad_fn=) " note

Since no activation is applied to spec, only an exp to make it positive, its upper bound is unlimited, which causes an unlimited bound for the generated audio. Leaving the spec unbounded is not a good idea.

How to solve this unbounded problem?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants