-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[gha] pull_docker_image fails with latest master #610
Comments
Did you try it with the regular master version? |
yes, same thing! I'll try to iterate through the commit history trying to identify where things get broken... |
as far as I can tell things get broken with the commits from "Commits on Jan 16, 2021" - see https://github.com/ros-industrial/industrial_ci/commits/master trying to find the specific commit... |
I think I just renamed "prepare_docker_image" to "pull_docker_image" step, so |
@ipa-mdl: might be nice to provide some bw-compatibility by supporting the old env-var for a while? |
@fmessmer: Apart from the rename, it might be better (and simpler) to run the login outside of industrial_ci. |
thanks! |
@fmessmer: Your config contains some superfluous settings, you might want to clean this up. And I strongly recommend against calling |
could you point me to something specific, please? I'm just getting started with GithubAction and appreciate any guidance...😉 |
The docker login can be added as a step (no need for a hook script). |
And it seems that you are not using git lfs inside (?), so |
to come back to this: |
we have been using our own docker image in github actions with our ici branch pinned to db261d7 (+ pylint feature from #477, i.e. https://github.com/fmessmer/industrial_ci/tree/master_pylint)
the config is (ref #574):
I rebased my
fmessmer/industrial_ci@master_pylint
branch to latestros-industrial/industrial_ci@master
branch to get the latest features, but with latestros-industrial/industrial_ci@master
we cannot pull our docker image anymore:I quickly investigated what has changed since db261d7, but could not find an obvious solution
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: