Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Force mode arguments ros2 #26

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 11, 2024

Conversation

URJala
Copy link
Contributor

@URJala URJala commented Jul 8, 2024

Add force mode arguments damping and gain scaling to the force mode service definition. This will be possible to specify in the Client library when this PR is implemented.
This is an update to PR.

@URJala
Copy link
Contributor Author

URJala commented Jul 8, 2024

I also changed some of the types in the service definition to match the ones used in the ROS1 version, as they didn't match and that seems weird, when they do the same thing.

urmarp and others added 4 commits October 8, 2024 13:05
The wrench is explicitly not stamped, since its geometric interpretation
differs depending on the `type` used.

Also for the limits a plain 6d vector is used, since its interpretation is
either a velocity or a position boundary.
And make identical to ROS1 version, add default values
Also added constants for the type parameter and added default values to all the simple values
@fmauch fmauch force-pushed the force_mode_arguments_ros2 branch from 462d3d9 to 57b0b10 Compare October 8, 2024 11:14
Since the geometric representation if the wrench is dependong on both,
the type and the task frame, it doesn't relly make sense to use a
stamped wrench here.
@fmauch fmauch changed the base branch from foxy-devel to humble-devel November 7, 2024 11:53
Having different domains in one field seems like an anti-pattern.
@fmauch fmauch force-pushed the force_mode_arguments_ros2 branch from 2d411aa to 6430111 Compare November 7, 2024 12:08
Copy link
Collaborator

@VinDp VinDp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@VinDp VinDp merged commit 5159919 into ros-industrial:humble-devel Nov 11, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants