We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DDS supports the optional attribute in IDL 4.2 specification attribute section 8.3.1.3. In C++, now that we have C++17, we can use std::optional.
A prior dicussion is here: https://discourse.ros.org/t/optional-fields-in-message/991/16
Consider adding a @optional specifier to rosidl that translates to the DDS optional .
@optional
Amend the ROS 2 design documentation for Standardized Annotations to add optional: https://design.ros2.org/articles/idl_interface_definition.html
Standardized Annotations
It's supported by:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
DDS supports the optional attribute in IDL 4.2 specification attribute section 8.3.1.3. In C++, now that we have C++17, we can use std::optional.
A prior dicussion is here: https://discourse.ros.org/t/optional-fields-in-message/991/16
Consider adding a
@optional
specifier to rosidl that translates to the DDS optional .Amend the ROS 2 design documentation for
Standardized Annotations
to add optional:https://design.ros2.org/articles/idl_interface_definition.html
It's supported by:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: