-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 211
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge this repository with https://github.com/rubygems/bundler.github.io #591
Comments
+1 |
@deivid-rodriguez Any update? +1 for the former as deploying to Heroku looks much slower than the current |
No updates @tnir, I never planned to tackle this one myself actually. So feel free to move this forward. So your plan is to deploy to GitHub Pages within this repo and also keep review apps? I think that would be ideal. |
@deivid-rodriguez Yes, my plan is:
and
The former tasks can be done with Admin role in these two repositories. |
Ok, so from now on deployment will be just |
While we can do so, I am not a fan of it. Use of the default branch " |
Ah, ok, yeah using the I think we can start with a PR to migrate the deploy task? I think we only need to change it to push to the |
Yes, you are right! |
The above is the instruction a person with Admin role can do whenever they wants to do from now (since the publishing sources are identical in Resources |
Prior to the above, as an Org admin, you should make sure if |
Now, I removed custom domain setting from |
Thanks for unsetting the custom domain in the old repo. Just removing |
Also I prefer adding a link to this repo to both README.md and |
I disabled to publish github pages from |
Thank you. All tasks were done, so closing. |
Thanks both, I wanted to do this for a long time 🎉 |
🥳 |
Thank you all. The problem we were having was just filed at: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/27583 |
This is not a big deal, really, but it feels a bit cumbersome to use two different repositories.
As far as I understand, we could either:
or
The former seems simpler, but the latter seems slightly more desirable to me, because we currently have a permanently red Heroku staging pipeline, just to keep Heroku review apps working, which is very useful. I guess we could fix that actually having a staging site that uses heroku, but at that point we may as well switch everything to Heroku.
Anways, this is not a big deal, but it could be an interesting/fun exercise for someone willing to play around with Heroku and Github Pages.
Summary
TODOs
rubygems/bundler-site
rubygems/bundler-site
(Attach Maintain role to @tnir #730)master
branch in https://github.com/rubygems/bundler.github.io to this repo asgh-pages
and keep up to date (as possible).gh-pages
branch and/
(root)rubygems/bundler-site
(Attach Maintain role to @tnir #730)bundler.io
in GitHub Pages at https://github.com/rubygems/bundler-site/settings/pagesrubygems/bundler.github.io
torubygems/bundler-site
in ci/deploy.rake (Use the same repository but the different branch for GitHub Pages for production #789)rubygems/bundler.github.io
rubygems/bundler.github.io
(Attach Maintain role to @tnir #730)None
as the publishing source at https://github.com/rubygems/bundler.github.io/settings/pagesThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: