-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Traffic shapping accounting for properties emissions #210
Comments
Hi Maël - agree that this is important. If you look at https://methodology.scope3.com/calculations#ad-platform you will see that there is a field |
Hi Brian, Thank you for your prompt response and detailed explanation. From what I understand, this functionality is incorporated into the Scope3 implementation, but it is not yet available in the open-source repository. To elaborate on my issue: as a publisher, I have two identical properties (same number of visits per month, same pages per visit, same number of SSPs connected ..). The only difference is that traffic shaping is deployed on one property, resulting in fewer ad calls sent (regardless of the bidder), making it a greener property. When modeling these two properties using the open-source repository, I would, for example, add a Please let me know if you need further details or if my explanation is unclear. |
Maël - feel free to submit a PR to update the open source code for this! |
Hello everyone,
I would love to contribute to your repository to implement a new feature allowing to account for traffic shaping policy during carbon emissions computation, on a publisher side. I would appreciate your thoughts on the implementations proposed below.
Here is my use case. At Greenbids, we want to be able, for our partner publishers, to account for whether traffic shaping is being deployed on their properties. This distinction is important because impressions on properties with traffic shaping should result in lower carbon emissions.
This leads me to consider two options:
traffic_shaping
(defaulting to 1), to theProperty
definition. The new corporate emissions would then be calculated as:self.corporate_emissions_g_co2e_per_impression * self.traffic_shaping
.ad_selection_gco2_per_impr
, and return this value multiplied by the traffic shaping coefficientFirst solution assumes that corporate emissions are tied to the ad selection process, which I am not entirely sure about. However, in solution 2, determining or setting a value for
ad_selection_gco2_per_impr
(which should depend on the type of property) can be challenging.Thanks for your time and this repository. I appreciate how well it articulates and models the advertising ecosystem.
Maël
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: