Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initializr metadata v3 #958

Open
snicoll opened this issue Jul 15, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Initializr metadata v3 #958

snicoll opened this issue Jul 15, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
status: pending-design-work Needs design work before any code can be developed type: enhancement

Comments

@snicoll
Copy link
Contributor

snicoll commented Jul 15, 2019

The current production version for all remote clients is v2.1. There are a number of changes that are required to improve the metadata model and to limit the disruption for remote clients, I'd like we propose brainstorming on a version 3 of this model.

v2.1 and v3 should be served at the same time with v2.1 being exactly as it is today. As long as the proper accept header is issued, existing clients shouldn't see the difference. We also need some metrics to measure the rate at which new clients pick this up.

This issue will be edited with the topics we'd like to include in this new major version. Current proposals include:

@joshlong
Copy link
Contributor

hi - could this perhaps be a vehicle by which to introduce other, non-dependency, checkboxes to the Spring Initializr?

for example: imagine a checkbox for AppCDS, Leyden, the virtual threads support (spring.threads.virtual.enabled=true, or a .sdkmanrc file or .jenv file, or other cool infrastructure features like that? We sort of do this with GraalVM, except that actually configures a dependency. A lot of these other things would surface features in configuration or add new files. It would make visible to the user some of the amazing things Spring can do for you and let them know it's a choice they could have.

@mhalbritter
Copy link
Contributor

@joshlong We're starting by collecting use cases for non-dependency checkboxes and then see if and when we implement something like this. I've opened spring-io/start.spring.io#1679 for that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: pending-design-work Needs design work before any code can be developed type: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants