Use correct bitfield offset for INCRBY using Lettuce.

Closes #2903
Original pull request: #2901

Author: osadchuk-roman

src/main/java/org/springframework/data/redis/connection/lettuce/LettuceConverters.java

@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@
  * @author Chris Bono
  * @author Vikas Garg
  * @author John Blum
+ * @author Roman Osadchuk
  */
 @SuppressWarnings("ConstantConditions")
 public abstract class LettuceConverters extends Converters {
@@ -720,7 +721,7 @@ public static BitFieldArgs toBitFieldArgs(BitFieldSubCommands subCommands) {
 					args = args.overflow(type);
 				}
 
-				args = args.incrBy(bitFieldType, (int) subCommand.getOffset().getValue(), ((BitFieldIncrBy) subCommand).getValue());
+				args = args.incrBy(bitFieldType, offset, ((BitFieldIncrBy) subCommand).getValue());
 			}
 		}
 

src/test/java/org/springframework/data/redis/connection/AbstractConnectionIntegrationTests.java

@@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
 import org.junit.jupiter.api.Disabled;
 import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
 import org.junit.jupiter.api.condition.DisabledOnOs;
+import org.junit.jupiter.params.ParameterizedTest;
+import org.junit.jupiter.params.provider.ValueSource;
 import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
 import org.springframework.dao.DataAccessException;
 import org.springframework.data.domain.Range;
@@ -110,6 +112,7 @@
  * @author Andrey Shlykov
  * @author Hendrik Duerkop
  * @author Shyngys Sapraliyev
+ * @author Roman Osadchuk
  */
 public abstract class AbstractConnectionIntegrationTests {
 
@@ -3577,6 +3580,23 @@ void bitFieldIncrByWithOverflowShouldWorkCorrectly() {
 		assertThat(results.get(3)).isNotNull();
 	}
 
+    @ParameterizedTest // DATAREDIS-2903
+    @ValueSource(booleans = {false, true})
+    void bitFieldIncrByAndThenGetShouldWorkCorrectly(boolean isMultipliedByTypeLengthOffset) {
+        var offset = isMultipliedByTypeLengthOffset
+            ? BitFieldSubCommands.Offset.offset(300L).multipliedByTypeLength()
+            : BitFieldSubCommands.Offset.offset(400L);
+
+        actual.add(connection.bitfield(KEY_1, create().incr(INT_8).valueAt(offset).by(1L)));
+        actual.add(connection.bitfield(KEY_1, create().get(INT_8).valueAt(offset)));
+
+        List<Object> results = getResults();
+
+        assertThat(results).hasSize(2)
+            // should return same results after INCRBY and GET operations for bitfield with same offset
+            .containsExactly(List.of(1L), List.of(1L));
+    }
+
 	@Test // DATAREDIS-562
 	void bitfieldShouldAllowMultipleSubcommands() {