You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your time. I will try to be concise.
The gist is, I am curious, with my limited knowledge, what other intepretations or hypotheses I could make other than these cells being multiplets...I'm sure I used scrublet correctly.
I have used
cellbender : to rid low quality cells filled with ambient RNA.
numerous combinations of normalization and batch correction methods
tried removing some blacklist genes before processing the data
However, I still end up with a number of cells from a specific sample that expresses the marker genes of fibroblasts, immune cells, epithelial and endothelial cells; pretty much all of the major cell types.
(cells were used for this analysis : percent.mt < 10~20, etc, 500 < nFeatures < 6000, 1000 < UMI)
Thank you so much for your help,
R.
(above) colors represent respective samples
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
rhlgyb
changed the title
Cells in sample suspicious for multiplets after scrublet?
Multiplets after scrublet?
Jun 23, 2023
Dear managers of scrublet,
Thank you for your time. I will try to be concise.
The gist is, I am curious, with my limited knowledge, what other intepretations or hypotheses I could make other than these cells being multiplets...I'm sure I used scrublet correctly.
I have used
However, I still end up with a number of cells from a specific sample that expresses the marker genes of fibroblasts, immune cells, epithelial and endothelial cells; pretty much all of the major cell types.
(cells were used for this analysis : percent.mt < 10~20, etc, 500 < nFeatures < 6000, 1000 < UMI)
Thank you so much for your help,
R.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: