-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 513
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature Request: Send MQTT SUM Data to OpenWB #240
Comments
I'm also in this situation. openWB is also an open source project with an great commmunity |
Why does openWB a separated MQTT broker? On small devices like the ESP this is a waste of resources. Also the complete handling of reconnect etc. needs to be implemented twice. It will need duplicate RAM as also the configuration has to be kept twice. |
The OpenWB is the broker. On the OpenDTU ESP just another client connection
to another broker is needed.
tbnobody ***@***.***> schrieb am Di., 18. Okt. 2022, 11:53:
… Why does openWB a separated MQTT broker? On small devices like the ESP
this is a waste of resources. Also the complete handling of reconnect etc.
needs to be implemented twice. It will need duplicate RAM as also the
configuration has to be kept twice.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#240 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADI6ECZH5DSYB4QRWFO5WETWDZXR3ANCNFSM6AAAAAARH2VAD4>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Yes, thats clear. Sorry that sentence above from me doesn't make sense. My question was, why is it not possible for openWB to use an existing MQTT Broker? Why does it need it's own?
It's not JUST. That's a rewrite of the existing connection handling and web UI etc. It also will take a amount of RAM because of the different connection parameters and the connection object itself. Just publishing values is one thing, but writing them to a different broker complete different one. |
I just found this screenshot: https://openwb.de/forum/download/file.php?id=4563&sid=ca9c32f10acc2b8d39ccc471373a90c4&mode=view Can you really enter a A jq query to sum the power of all inverters could look like this: |
@dersch81 Dirk has this been solved by entering the proposed jq query into the Open Wallbox fields ? PV-Modul: |
I love OpenDTU! I'm using OpenWB as a Wallbox and more and need all the actual data in it.
At the moment i'm sending the data like this:
OpenDTU => MQTT to HomeAssistant => NodeRed SUM all inverter data => MQTT to OpenWB
I don't like to have all the Middleware in the data flow.
Therefore it would be so great to have:
OpenDTU => MQTT to OpenWB
OpenWB just need two topics:
Per MQTT zu schreiben:
openWB/set/pv/2/W PV-Erzeugungsleistung in Watt, int, positiv
openWB/set/pv/2/WhCounter Erzeugte Energie in Wh, float, nur positiv
OpenDTU need a topic where all inverter Watt and YieldDaily will be summarized and then send it to configurable topics. Besides the HomeAssistant MQTT (or other MQTT server) should be usable, too. So we need two MQTT targets as an option. The OpenWB target could be specific and with less options as needed like above.
That would be awesome and usefull for a lot of users with OpenWB and Hoymiles.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: