-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PROPOSAL] Migration to ripgrep #123
Comments
I can anticipate some concerns about portability, but I can imagine that this might have some performance benefits, given I always have ripgrep installed on all of my systems, so I decided to give it a try. The only really tricky piece is that If you'd like to try the ripgrep version you can just uninstall If someone would like to write up some performance tests so that we can more objectively identify how much improvement there is, if any, that would be great. @BogBel, I think it would be really helpful for this issue if you could expand the title and description to make it clear why someone might want this change, why it should be considered safe, etc. I think that if we just modify the patterns to assume extended regular expressions, so that Is there any developer interest in merging such changes? I'm happy to open up a pull request for further discussion if so. |
Hi, I hope this won't sadden anyone but in general I'm not in favor of this. The speed / slowness comes mostly from |
Actually I agree.. |
Super old, but ended up using your code, thanks! |
https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: