Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Standardize license headers in TOML/YAML files #2315

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

pderrenger
Copy link
Member

@pderrenger pderrenger commented Jan 15, 2025

This PR updates all YAML file headers to use a standardized license format. 🔄

Changes:

  • 📝 Standardized header: # Ultralytics 🚀 AGPL-3.0 License - https://ultralytics.com/license
  • 🧹 Ensures consistent spacing after headers
  • 🔍 Applies to all YAML files except those in venv

Learn more about Ultralytics licensing 📚

🛠️ PR Summary

Made with ❤️ by Ultralytics Actions

🌟 Summary

Updated license references across various files for consistency and clarity.

📊 Key Changes

  • Replaced the old license comment # Ultralytics YOLOv3 🚀, AGPL-3.0 license with the updated format:
    # Ultralytics 🚀 AGPL-3.0 License - https://ultralytics.com/license.
  • Cleaned or clarified license references in issues templates, continuous integration (CI) workflows, data configuration files, model configuration files, and other project files.

🎯 Purpose & Impact

  • 📝 Consistency: Ensures all files reflect the same format for the project's license reference.
  • 🔗 Clarity: Includes a direct, visible link to the license details.
  • Enhanced Communication: Better visibility and understanding of licensing terms, benefiting both contributors and users.
  • 🚀 Impact: No functional changes to the code; purely cosmetic for ease of maintainability and compliance clarity.

@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher merged commit 239aaaf into master Jan 15, 2025
9 checks passed
@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher deleted the refactor-20250115173012 branch January 15, 2025 16:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants