We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Moin!
I find the following inconsistent (happened when we try to count propagators at born level)
c A; g ff = A; id A(?a) = max_(?a); print; .end
which produces 1. I would expect here unevaluated as in
c A; g ff = A; id A(?a) = sign_(?a); print; .end
which gives "sign_".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm not sure if this is a bug or a design choice, but if we want to "fix" it, then it seems that the break statement at
break
form/sources/normal.c
Line 1836 in 0289435
needs to be changed to like goto nospec or something with the same effect.
goto nospec
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Moin!
I find the following inconsistent (happened when we try to count propagators at born level)
which produces 1. I would expect here unevaluated as in
which gives "sign_".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: