Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Analyse - Guidepost without name create an "issue/fact" in analysis tool #285

Open
Binnette opened this issue Dec 2, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@Binnette
Copy link

Binnette commented Dec 2, 2022

Hi, in France we have a lot of guidepost without name:
photo-5787254563919739955-y.jpg

It seems that adding this kind of guidepost to a hiking node network relation cause an "issue/fact". Can you please address this kind of guidepost to prevent creating a fact in your analysis tool? Those guideposts without name have the tag "noname=yes". So maybe you can create a rule in your analysis tool to disable analyse when a guidepost have this tag?

Example of guidepost with name: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1587011575
Example of guidepost without name: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8807102300

Have a nice day

@Binnette Binnette changed the title Guidepost withour name create an "issue/fact" analysis tool Guidepost without name create an "issue/fact" in analysis tool Dec 2, 2022
@Binnette Binnette changed the title Guidepost without name create an "issue/fact" in analysis tool Analyse - Guidepost without name create an "issue/fact" in analysis tool Dec 2, 2022
@vmarc
Copy link
Owner

vmarc commented Dec 4, 2022

@Binnette thanks for asking this question, and also thanks for your translations!!! The results of your work should be visible online since the new release yesterday.

Currently, nodes in a route relation that are tagged with "tourism=information" and "information=guidepost" (or "information=map", or "information=board") are already ignored during the node network analysis. Both your example nodes should not cause any issue.

Close to your first example guidepost is the actual node network node, part of route Champ Fila - Odysée.

The second example guidepost does not seem to be part of any node network route.

Do you still see a need for knooppuntnet to look at tag "noname=yes"?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants