Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review backlog issues for IMSC #14

Closed
2 tasks done
nigelmegitt opened this issue Jan 9, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

Review backlog issues for IMSC #14

nigelmegitt opened this issue Jan 9, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@nigelmegitt
Copy link
Contributor

nigelmegitt commented Jan 9, 2019

Some issues were deferred to the backlog for IMSC 1.1 - we should consider the status of the requirements embodied by those issues, and assess whether or not we want to address them in 2019.

Specifically:

@css-meeting-bot
Copy link
Member

The Timed Text Working Group just discussed Review backlog issues for IMSC tt-reqs#14, and agreed to the following:

  • RESOLUTION: Proceed with this requirement in IMSC 1.1 2nd Ed.
The full IRC log of that discussion <nigel> Topic: Review backlog issues for IMSC tt-reqs#14
<nigel> github: https://github.com//issues/14
<nigel> Pierre: I'd like to narrow this to 2nd Edition of IMSC 1.1 rather than a new edition.
<nigel> .. I don't think "review backlog" is a requirement.
<nigel> .. We can fix errors and apply editorial improvement, but permitting embedded image is a brand
<nigel> .. new requirement that would potentially be IMSC 1.2 or IMSC 2, so on this one we should deal with
<nigel> .. editorial errors.
<nigel> .. That's #465 and #469 for example.
<nigel> .. Just like we said for TTML2 2nd Ed earlier.
<nigel> Nigel: I just added #469 to the issue.
<nigel> .. And removed #82.
<nigel> .. Shall we just say we'll do this?
<nigel> Pierre: Yes I'm happy to schedule this for IMSC 1.1 2nd Ed
<nigel> Nigel: Do we need to do it in IMSC 1.0.1 too?
<nigel> Pierre: No we should not touch that now.
<nigel> Nigel: OK
<nigel> .. Any other views on this? Do we have consensus to proceed?
<nigel> RESOLUTION: Proceed with this requirement in IMSC 1.1 2nd Ed.

@nigelmegitt
Copy link
Contributor Author

This was completed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants