Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UGS sent previously opened file, despite showing current file #2658

Open
MikeBenza opened this issue Dec 11, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

UGS sent previously opened file, despite showing current file #2658

MikeBenza opened this issue Dec 11, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@MikeBenza
Copy link

Version

2.0.13

Hardware / Firmware

GRBL 1.1

What happened

I'm CNC carving a long piece of wood in 5 sections. I've got 5 different NC files: section-1.nc through section-5.nc. I'm working from 5 down to 1 just because that setup was easiest. Sections 5 and 4 worked fine. I remounted the piece for section 3 and just before I started it, realized I still had the section 4 file open. I loaded section 3 and then ran it.

For some reason, it sent the section 4 file instead of the section 3 file. The messages.log talks about loading section 3, but it sent section 4.

What it carved:
PXL_20241211_035921553

What the UI showed
PXL_20241211_035919234

messages.log

sections-3-4.zip

Note: I'm using GRBL, but I'm not sure which version.

How to reproduce

I haven't figured out how to reproduce this.

Operating System

Mac M2 Sonoma 14.5

Anything else

No response

@breiler
Copy link
Collaborator

breiler commented Dec 11, 2024

Your version of UGS is ancient and I would recommend that you upgrade and try again:
https://github.com/winder/Universal-G-Code-Sender?tab=readme-ov-file#downloads

The other thing that I notice is a large amount of errors in the log. Do you perhaps have a offline controller connected to the machine?

@MikeBenza
Copy link
Author

I'll try upgrading when I get back to it in a few days.

I do have an offline controller. I wasn't able to (quickly) figure out how to set up my z probe in UGS, and I preferred the continuous jog on the offline controller (I was much less likely to make a mistake in it than in UGS).

@breiler
Copy link
Collaborator

breiler commented Dec 11, 2024

Using an offline controller together with UGS may have undesired side effects.

UGS keeps track of all commands it sends and the responses. If you have a secondary unit that also sends commands UGS will get confused.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants