You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Personally I am low on funds right now so thinking of just waiting for someone like Electrolama to start mass-producing and selling plug-and-play CC2652-based adapters such as their Zig-a-zig-ah ("ZZH") USB-stick at a lower price, but what hardware would you recommend today to someone who has enough funds now and is not willing to wait?
There are quite a few to choose from in Texas Instruments current SimpleLink multi-standard family:
It looks like most people in the Zigbee2mqtt community who has made the lead is currently recommending the slightly more expensive CC13x2 based LAUNCHXL-CC1352P-2 development kit over the CC26x2 based LAUNCHXL-CC26X2R1 development kit for a number of reasons, though mainly because CC1352P-2 has a built-in RF-amplifier (PA/LNA) frontend as well as an SMA-connector for an external antenna and therefore has a much better link quality (people are even complaining that LAUNCHXL-CC26X2R1 has worse link quality than a CC2531 with an external antenna).
+1: Has a built-in RF-amplifier (PA/LNA) frontend for potentially better range (assuming Zigbee2mqtt will support enablement - enhancement is raised). RF design includes a shield.
+1: Has a built-in SMA antenna connector (although it's still necessary to de/re-solder a tiny SMD capacitor switch from PCB antenna to SMA. Should provide an increase in range.
+1: Can support sub 1GHz - opening the possibility for 868MHz (EU) and 915MHz (NA) Zigbee for better range (technically possible but no idea how many end devices support it) and possibly other applications in the future… IMO this “benefit” should not be a consideration at the point.
-1: Bigger PCB (~2cm) than the CC26X2R1
-1: A little ($10) more expensive than the CC26X2R1
There are two versions with different RF suitability - The P-2 version favours 2.4GHz rather than sub 1GHz and this would be the recommended version to obtain for Zigbee2mqtt
-1: Theoretically less range than CC1352P due to lack of RF-amplifier (PA/LNA) frontend
-1: Possibility to use external antenna (if de/re-solder the tiny SMD capacitor) but that requires a JSC-SMA antenna adaptor which is not cheap (~20 euros)
-1: No support for sub-1GHz but there is no clear advantage of this currently
Other notes:
There does not yet appear to be any more economical options from online China retailers like Aliexpress, etc. for either of these.
Both have built-in JTAG programmer so no need for an external programmer
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@sanyatuning What are LQI and RSSI values reported by your different CCxxxx devices and sensors?
FYI, I read that OmerK has been or is looking after manufacturing partner(s) for the Electrolama Zig-a-zig-ah (zzh) adapter for a production version. Read that he was/is considering both crowdfunding sites, such as Crowd Supply and Tindie, as well as companies with already established supply-chains, like ITead (of Sonoff fame).
Anyway, current Zig-a-zig-ah prototype is also lacking PA (Power Amplifier) as it doesn't use CC2652P
"Also thinking of a second variant that uses CC2652P, sadly not pin compatible with CC2652R (or CC2652RB) so this will have be a new board spin. "P" part has a built-in PA (but no LNA) and should provide better range."
What hardware would you recommend someone to buy for Z-Stack 3.x Zigbee coordinator firmware?
Personally I am low on funds right now so thinking of just waiting for someone like Electrolama to start mass-producing and selling plug-and-play CC2652-based adapters such as their Zig-a-zig-ah ("ZZH") USB-stick at a lower price, but what hardware would you recommend today to someone who has enough funds now and is not willing to wait?
There are quite a few to choose from in Texas Instruments current SimpleLink multi-standard family:
http://www.ti.com/wireless-connectivity/simplelink-solutions/multi-standard/products.html
It looks like most people in the Zigbee2mqtt community who has made the lead is currently recommending the slightly more expensive CC13x2 based LAUNCHXL-CC1352P-2 development kit over the CC26x2 based LAUNCHXL-CC26X2R1 development kit for a number of reasons, though mainly because CC1352P-2 has a built-in RF-amplifier (PA/LNA) frontend as well as an SMA-connector for an external antenna and therefore has a much better link quality (people are even complaining that LAUNCHXL-CC26X2R1 has worse link quality than a CC2531 with an external antenna).
LAUNCHXL-CC1352P-2
There are two versions with different RF suitability - The P-2 version favours 2.4GHz rather than sub 1GHz and this would be the recommended version to obtain for Zigbee2mqtt
LAUNCHXL-CC26X2R1
Other notes:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: