Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generate DeviceKey RoT for all non-internal storage type #67

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

LDong-Arm
Copy link
Contributor

@LDong-Arm LDong-Arm commented Nov 30, 2020

Corrects #66

Both TDB_EXTERNAL and FILESYSTEM are based on SecureStore, which depends on DeviceKey which requires a Root of Trust (RoT) being present. In other words, we need to generate an RoT in all cases other than TDB_INTERNAL.

@ARMmbed/mbed-os-core

All external TDB and filesystem storage types for KV global API
are based on SecureStore, which depends on DeviceKey which
requires a Root of Trust (RoT) being present.
@LDong-Arm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ARMmbed/mbed-os-core This PR has been open for a while, but it would be good to have it reviewed.

@@ -63,7 +63,9 @@ void kv_store_global_api_example()
res = kv_reset("/kv/");
printf("kv_reset -> %d\n", err_code(res));

if (strcmp(STR(MBED_CONF_STORAGE_STORAGE_TYPE), "TDB_EXTERNAL") == 0) {
if (strcmp(STR(MBED_CONF_STORAGE_STORAGE_TYPE), "TDB_INTERNAL") != 0) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was the intention the same originally but with an incorrect condition?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The original condition was incomplete. The condition should be "anything except TDB_INTERNAL", which includes both TDB_EXTERNAL and FILESYSTEM.

Copy link
Contributor

@hugueskamba hugueskamba Mar 31, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So the intention was the same?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The original condition was incomplete.

How did you complete the condition? It [the condition] is now the opposite of what it was before?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not the opposite. Notice TDB_EXTERNAL, == before, and TDB_INTERNAL, != now.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah I didnt notice INTERNAL...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants