Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

api: first draft for removing nativespec from ImageBuf #4482

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bfraboni
Copy link
Contributor

@bfraboni bfraboni commented Oct 7, 2024

Second half of API changes to remove nativespec from ImageCache and ImageBuf for issue: #4436

  • it currently does not compile, I'm just opening this on to discuss with @lgritz about the changes required.
  • I have removed nativespec() from the ImageBuf API but this creates a bunch of problems I have not answers for in ImageBuf::read

const ImageSpec& nativespec() const;
TypeDesc file_format() const;
/// Same as the above for channel specific formats.
std::vector<TypeDesc> file_channelformats() const;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure how much it matters, but do you think returning a vector is good here? As opposed to returning a const vector& or a cspan<TypeDesc>? (But those are only options it's stored somewhere in the IB and we can make a stable reference to it.

@@ -361,7 +361,9 @@ declare_imagebuf(py::module& m)
"height"_a = 0, "depth"_a = 0)
.def("spec", &ImageBuf::spec,
py::return_value_policy::reference_internal)
.def("nativespec", &ImageBuf::nativespec,
.def("file_format", &ImageBuf::file_format,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think here, like with C++, for back compatibility we'll want to preserve a nativespec() call, even if it does something different than before.

@lgritz
Copy link
Collaborator

lgritz commented Oct 10, 2024

I think this is going in the right direction. Looks like failed tests? And you need a DCO?

@lgritz
Copy link
Collaborator

lgritz commented Oct 18, 2024

Just a remind that there are some pending items to finish this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants